Could the Khartoum hit have been Naval, not Air? Nobody (outside major intel agencies) knows for sure what exactly happened in Khartoum. Some observers claim the satellite photos show "craters" they say must be from bombs or missiles. Of course IED explosives can cause craters as well. Nonetheless... if Israel might be involved, as Sudan claims... any opinions on the liklihood that they were not munitions delivered by Israeli air assets, but were possibly conventionally-armed Popeye SLCM's launched from Israeli Dolphins in the Red Sea? Khartoum is only about 400 miles (and change) from Sudan's coastline. A small covey of Popeye's could have done the deed. And SLCMs would have been a safer bet then sending jets. I know not much is open source about the Popeye SLCM either, but it should have a 1500 km range. Any thoughts? |
Russian sources claim it was an F-15I strike. |
From my understanding, Israel subs mostly operated in mediteranian. To move it, they have to used Suez, which under present situations in Egypt something that seems Israel did not want to do. In other word, Israel did not want someone in Egypt know their movement and possibly raised alarm in Sudan. Concerning Egypt now not working on sole command just like used to be under Mubarak. Using F-15I is much more easier to covert, rather than has to move their Subs through red sea operation. Unless they have permanent stationed some of their subs on Eilat. |
Quote:
It is a good chance for them to sell some fighters to Sudan |
Quote:
|
It was also mentioned somewhere that there was an aircraft loitering in international airspace which was responsible for jamming Sudanese radar and comms. Makes sense if indeed 'foreign' aircraft had conducted a raid. |
Quote:
The aircraft wouldn't have identified themselves. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright ©2003-2011 DefenceTalk.com. All Rights Reserved.