Ninety-Three Countries Sign Ban on Cluster Bombs

yasin_khan

New Member
OSLO, Norway - Ninety-three countries have signed a landmark treaty banning cluster bombs, seen as one of the biggest international humanitarian agreements clinched in the past decade, host country Norway said Dec. 4.

"We are on track," Norway's deputy minister of foreign affairs, Raymond Johansen, said at the end of the two-day signing ceremony in Oslo.
The Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM), an umbrella organization grouping about 300 humanitarian aid groups, said four or five additional countries may sign the text Dec. 4.
The treaty was also to be sent to the U.N. in New York, where other countries will be able to sign it.
Major arms producers such as China, Russia and the U.S. have however refused to sign the treaty, unlike most European countries.
Afghanistan, Laos and Lebanon, three countries heavily affected by cluster bombs, also put their names to the document. Iraq has meanwhile said it would sign "as soon as possible."
The ban outlaws the use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions, and requires signatories to assist victims of the weapons.
"This is the biggest humanitarian treaty of the last decade," Richard Moyes of the CMC said.
Dropped from warplanes or fired from artillery guns, cluster bombs explode in mid-air to randomly scatter hundreds of bomblets, which can be just three inches big.
Many bomblets fail to explode can kill and maim long after a conflict ends.
When the treaty was hammered out in negotiations in May in Dublin, it was agreed upon by 107 countries. Organizers attributed the difference between that number and the 93 that have signed the document so far to bureaucratic reasons.
The treaty must be ratified by at least 30 countries before it can go into effect. Norway, which played a key role in obtaining the ban, has already launched the ratification process, as have Ireland, Sierre Leone and the Holy See.

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3848331&c=ASI&s=TOP
 

bd popeye

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
The latest and most desustrust are the american one which are launched by Jets.
desustrust?? I think you meant destructive. The latest?? Cluster Bombs(CBU) are by no means new. They've been around since 1968. I served in the USN from '71-'91. They were called "Rockeye" they where two types..Which I cannot remember all the details.

Nowadays the newer CBU is the;

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/cbu-59.htm

The CBU-59 APAM an antipersonnel, antimaterial weapon developed in the 1970s as a successor to Rockeye. It uses the same Rockeye dispenser, but has 717 smaller BLU-77 bomblets fitted into the case. In addition to its armor-piercing effect, it also has antipersonnel fragmentation and incendiary features. One hundred and eight-six were delivered during the Gulf war.
This is a very effective weapon. I doubt if the US will sign any treaty banning their use.
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Janes said:
Development of 155 mm DM 642

The DM 642 (RB 63) 155 mm cargo shell was originally a Rheinmetall development, with some funding from the German Ministry of Defence, to produce a cargo projectile with a longer range than the 155 mm Dual-Purpose Improved Conventional Munition (DP-ICM) M483A1.

The first test rounds were fired during 1983. The 155 mm DM 642 became a joint development with Simmel Difesa SpA (formerly BPD Difesa e Spazio) of Italy, which also marketed the DM 642. The 155 mm RB 63 projectile produced by Simmel has been known as the 155 mm IM 303 BCR (Bomblets Cargo Round), or simply as the BCR.Earlier versions of the DM 642 varied by having several forms of expulsion units or bomblets without a self-destruct capability.

The first type was the DM 602, followed by the essentially similar DM 612 and then by the DM 632, which introduced DM 1383 self-destruct bomblets. An essentially similar enhanced-range projectile, the Rheinmetall 155 mm Rh 49, was developed in tandem with the RB 63 (DM 642) and involves a low-drag body combined with a Base-Bleed (BB) unit ballistically matched to the US 155 mm M864 DP-ICM, producing a maximum range of about 30,000 m; the number of DM 1383 bomblets carried is reduced to 49. Weight, unfuzed, is 46.13 kg; maximum range is 28,500 m. This extended-range version is known as the DM 652...


Description

The 155 mm DM 642 is a separate-loading base-ejection carrier projectile, using a high-grade steel carrier shell (known as the DM 1396), with the cavity filled by a total of 63 DM 1383 (RH II) dual-purpose (anti-personnel/anti-armour) bomblets. An expulsion charge is located under the nose fuze well and within the streamlined ogive, while the recessed aluminium base is secured in position by shear pins. A wide copper drive band encircles the body close to the boat-tailed base section. The projectile is supplied with a lifting plug.

After firing, the nose-mounted Mechanical-Time and SuperQuick (MTSQ) DM 163 or M577 fuze will function at the selected time, ideally about 300 to 500 m above the target area. The functioning of the fuze ignites, via a small booster charge, the expulsion charge, which creates an expansion of gases within the ogive. This pressure is transmitted downwards to the aluminium baseplate until the shear pins rupture and the baseplate falls away.

The contents of the bomblet are then expelled through the base and are scattered over the target area by centrifugal forces created by the spin of the carrier shell.The 155 mm DM 642 carries 63 DM 1383 bomblets arranged in a central stack of nine bomblets surrounded by a further six nine-bomblet stacks. Each DM 1383 bomblet has a steel body containing a small shaped charge and a sensitive impact fuze. The bomblets are intended to detonate on impact, but if for any reason this fails to happen, a self-destruct fuze will activate.

The Germans and many other countries also have developed very capable cargo sub-munitions which is to be delivered by 155 mm artillery. They are part of a modern army's arsenal.

The principles are simple:

(i) fragments lose velocity quickly and many small shaped charges have a higher chance of a direct hit than a single warhead;

(ii) several smart sub-munitions can cover a larger area and potentially hit more targets at once than a single smart munition; and

(iii) cargo sub-munitions can scatter many mines at once over a larger area, and more easily than many smaller delivery munitions with only one mine each.​

The introduction of cargo sub-munitions on a large scale increased the effectiveness and changed the artillery's effects. Armies that remove cargo round stocks need to re-evaluate their requirements for artillery quantity as cargo sub-munitions provide greater artillery effects. In the past, one of the concerns was unexploded dud bomblets and manufacturers are starting to address this concern, which is also a safety issue for your own troops.

There is no need to single out the Americans for criticism, as they have lots of company. I enclose a link to General Dynamics and Denel for a range of their artillery munitions.
 
Last edited:
Top