Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Missiles & WMDs
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

-77689755705287080691.jpg

-7768975570528708069.jpg

Ural_Taifun_V-day_parade_Yekaterinburg.jpg

Kamaz_Taifun_at_trials.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





Just a virtual scenario about unmanned missile launch

This is a discussion on Just a virtual scenario about unmanned missile launch within the Missiles & WMDs forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Hello dear members, This is my first post and I hope not the last. I was a reader of this ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old January 28th, 2010   #1
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
Threads:
Question Just a virtual scenario about unmanned missile launch

Hello dear members,

This is my first post and I hope not the last.
I was a reader of this forum for quite a while.

So just imagine some country (of course with a nuclear arsenal) developing a top secret WMD system.
It consists of number of fully autonomous launch platforms submerged in the ocean and drifting freely (a somewhat freely) in the depth of somewhat 1000-2000 feet underwater.
The platforms are not pressurized meaning their internal pressure in equal to the environment. So they drift and wait for a signal (similar to HAARP) for a launch. When signal received the platform emerges to close to the surface start position and launch a missile. Each platform is relatively small and carries only one missile making detection very hard.

Don't judge me strongly. This is just a concept idea. What is your opinion about a feasibility of such program and your opinion on entrusting a launch key to a robotic platform?
Curious George is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2010   #2
Defense Enthusiast
Sergeant
Kilo 2-3's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 288
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curious George View Post
Hello dear members,

This is my first post and I hope not the last.
I was a reader of this forum for quite a while.

So just imagine some country (of course with a nuclear arsenal) developing a top secret WMD system.
It consists of number of fully autonomous launch platforms submerged in the ocean and drifting freely (a somewhat freely) in the depth of somewhat 1000-2000 feet underwater.
The platforms are not pressurized meaning their internal pressure in equal to the environment. So they drift and wait for a signal (similar to HAARP) for a launch. When signal received the platform emerges to close to the surface start position and launch a missile. Each platform is relatively small and carries only one missile making detection very hard.

Don't judge me strongly. This is just a concept idea. What is your opinion about a feasibility of such program and your opinion on entrusting a launch key to a robotic platform?
The technology to do this is still a few years away on this one, but the concept seems entirely do-able. The problems with it would stem from political concerns over entrusting nukes to an autonomous vehicle, and over fears of the sub simply having a massive failure and sinking with a nuke still onboard and loads of sensitive electronics (which could fall into enemy hands)
Kilo 2-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31st, 2010   #3
Defense Enthusiast
Captain
No Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: southern highlands NSW
Posts: 698
Threads:
Interesting idea
I don’t know how feasible it would be to place it in international water’s ,it would need some defensive measure of some sort as when a sub comes to close it can move under it own power, or it will take it for a ride home if it’s not declared.

If it is in deep enough water’s in your own 12 mile exclusion zone it would be doable in the future, but would still need a self defence measure to protect itself from nosey subs
t68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 3rd, 2010   #4
Super Moderator
General
Feanor's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
Posts: 11,138
Threads:
How would this unmanned platform respond if it was somehow discovered by the enemy before it got a launch order?

It would have to be more then just a submerged launch platform. It would have to be a full unmanned submarine.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 3rd, 2010   #5
Defense Enthusiast
Sergeant
Spetsznaz's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Spokane,Washington
Posts: 220
Threads:
Another factor is that how would the WORLD respond to Nuclear weapons just hang'n out in the ocean, we already have submarine capable of making ICBM launches, but putting a platform with A Nuke and just leaving it there would be Something that will piss everyone off ESPECIALLY SINCE ITS UNMANNED
________________
When many people look at a weapon they see death, when I look at a weapon I see art

-Me
Spetsznaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 4th, 2010   #6
Defense Enthusiast
Sergeant
Kilo 2-3's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 288
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spetsznaz View Post
Another factor is that how would the WORLD respond to Nuclear weapons just hang'n out in the ocean, we already have submarine capable of making ICBM launches, but putting a platform with A Nuke and just leaving it there would be Something that will piss everyone off ESPECIALLY SINCE ITS UNMANNED
The unmanned concern is a valid one. However, sub crews are expensive to train and if cost and manning concerns continue to grow, an unmanned platform might recieve more and more consideration.

On a related note. If I recall rightly, during the Cold War, John Craven's Navy Office of Special Projects briefly did contemplate unmanned underwater missile silos. The water pressure was thought to offer extra protection since it would compress and strengthen the hull of the silo, making it less vulnerable to attacks.
Kilo 2-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 4th, 2010   #7
Super Moderator
General
Feanor's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
Posts: 11,138
Threads:
Iirc the USSR had similar projects on paper, but they never took off.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7th, 2010   #8
Defense Enthusiast
Captain
No Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: southern highlands NSW
Posts: 698
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Iirc the USSR had similar projects on paper, but they never took off.
So it's not unheard of then,any more info out there some where as to what they thought of?
t68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7th, 2010   #9
Defense Professional / Analyst
Major
Salty Dog's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brazil
Posts: 799
Threads:
The missile itself would have to be kept in a pressurized vessel. A missile airframe could not withstand the pressures of such depths and can not be exposed to the corrosive environment of seawater. You would also have to workout a replacement/maintenance schedule. Since the missile silo remains in a relatively fixed position and presumably international waters, an adversary can drop some autonomous hunter killer sub bots to seek out and destroy the missile launchers. Since they are not crewed, there may not be any sovereignty issues.

Last edited by Salty Dog; February 8th, 2010 at 07:15 AM.
Salty Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7th, 2010   #10
Super Moderator
General
Feanor's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
Posts: 11,138
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by t68 View Post
So it's not unheard of then,any more info out there some where as to what they thought of?
Iirc it was more along the lines of secret underwater ICBM silos. I'll see what I can dig up online. The info I found was in Maksim Kalashnikov's book, Battle for the Skies (Битва за Небеса). And while Kalashnikov is hardly a reputable source in regards to his analysis, his ability to dig up obscenely obscure facts often comes in handy.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7th, 2010   #11
Defense Enthusiast
Sergeant
Spetsznaz's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Spokane,Washington
Posts: 220
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Iirc it was more along the lines of secret underwater ICBM silos. I'll see what I can dig up online. The info I found was in Maksim Kalashnikov's book, Battle for the Skies (Битва за Небеса). And while Kalashnikov is hardly a reputable source in regards to his analysis, his ability to dig up obscenely obscure facts often comes in handy.
Hey feanor sorry to get off topic, but is that book available in English?
________________
When many people look at a weapon they see death, when I look at a weapon I see art

-Me
Spetsznaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2010   #12
Defense Enthusiast
Captain
dragonfire's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 686
Threads:
Why is the structure freely drifting, it shd be fixed to avoid inadvertant accidents. Also do you intend it to have propulsion, the vehicles will change drasticaly depending on this. Nuclear tipped weapons would be very dangerous to leave out like tht, since it is unmanned it can be considered risky for the warheads to fall into wrong hands
dragonfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
concept, launch, nuclear, platform

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 PM.