Mountain Warfare

Firn

Active Member
I decided to open this new topic, because it covers warfare not only in high altitude as another thread, but also in lower regions. If the mods want to merge them, it is fine to me.


A very short overview


Mountains were always a difficult terrain to fight in and usually greatly increased the ability of the defender to resist even a determined attacker.

Hannibal is perhaps the most famous general of the ancient world who was ambushed in a timeless manners while crossing the Alps.

"So long as the Carthaginians had remained in the plains the various chieftains of the Allobroges had left them alone because of their fear both of the Carthaginian cavalry and also of the barbarian troops who were escorting them. But as soon as the latter had set off for home and Hannibal's troops began to advance into difficult country, the Allobrogian chiefs gathered a large force and took up commanding positions alongside the road by which the Carthaginians would have to climb."

"In the narrow pass the marching column was rapidly losing cohesion; there was great confusion and excitement amongst the men, and still more amongst the terrified horses, so the tribesmen, in the hope that any hostile action by themselves would be enough to complete their discomfiture, came swarming down the rocky and precipitous slopes, sure-footed as they were from long familiarity with their wild and trackless terrain."
Another place, another ambush:

"The natives, springing from their places of concealment, fiercely assaulted front and rear, leaping into the fray, hurling missiles, rolling down rocks from the heights above."
Note that such IGDs (Improvised Gravitational Devices) were still used, combined with sharpshooters to devastating effect in the Napoleonic wars in the gorges of the alpine valleys of Tyrol. Or later in the terrible conflicts in the Dolomites. Or in the Kargil war.

During the first world war the Alps between the Austro-Hungarian empire and the former ally Italy, were the scenery of a hard struggle, perhaps the first "modern" example of mountain warfare. In the second world war many mountain ranges and areas from Northern Norway to Northern Africa, from the Vosges to the Caucasus witnessed heavy fighting. Since then mountain warfare has played a significant role in many conflicts, most recently in the Himalaya and in Afghanistan.


Readings



German Mountain Warfare - a WWII manual


The German view of Mountain warfare, 1944. I read it a long while ago, but still remember how the importance of well-coordinated precise and heavy firepower delivered by mortars and artillery was outlined. Fits well my very limited experience. Further it is interesting that during the war they heavily increased the oveall firepower and made it mortar platoons organic at the company level. All in all for all who don't know the difficulties of mountain warfare a still very relevant text.


Mountain operations

The dedicated American field manual, a good modern companion to the German manual.


The need for specialized units

Written by Major Muhammad Asim Malik, Pakistan Army. It highlights some aspects of high-altitude wafare which make specialized troops a must.



Firepower in limited war

A good read to place part of the topic of firepower in a broader context, by the 44th Commandant of the U.S. Army War College, Major General Scales. Good chapter on Afghanistan.



Bear went over the mountain

The strategy and tactics employed by the insurgents and Counter-insurgents in the Soviet-Afghan war are still a worthwhile and telling read. A commented look from both sides is given by this classic.


Lessons in Mountain warfare

A tentative list of lessons learned, taken from the book above. Not a bad quick primer, but can of course not capture the richness of the book.


High Altitude Warfare: The Kargil conflict and the future

This paper is very interesting because it partly mirrored my own feelings when I read it and was helpful to think about my ex-trade in a broader way. It also convinced me even more of the necessity of heavy precise firepower in mountain warfare:






Every good contribuition is welcomed.




P.S:

The pictures of Korengal remind me a bit about my home region. Many an invader must have been felt this way in many a part of the Alps, where locals often formed independent defensive foederations. Switzerland was just the most successful one which developed out of a medieval alliance. The seven comunities managed to survive 500 years. The magnifica comunita' existed for almost 700 years. The small and old language of Ladin still goes strong. Mountain folk was often very conservative and sometimes downright fanatically religious, but usually just wanted to remain free and be left alone in peace. The seven communities for example described themselves as "Dise saint Siben, Alte Komeun, Prudere Liben", "This are Seven, Old Communities, Brothers dear".

The habit of ambushing columns of foreigners has been tempered recently by the money they now willingly spend here :)
 
Last edited:

Firn

Active Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
A Focus on Afghanistan


Korengal valley - A map


Stalemate in Korengal Valley - A NYTimes video


Battle Company Is Out There - an excellent reportage.


An ambush and a comrade lost


A night patrol in the Korengal valley


I'm still surprised that the US soldiers have to wear armor and so much equipment even in night patrols. The amount of fatigue casualities is rather worrying. It must be ordered top-down, but it makes such patrols mostly futile. I mean how do you want to surprise with a certain consistency the enemy if you have to call in the helicopter to medi-evac worn out men? It almost seems to be a bad joke.
 

joeroot

New Member
A Focus on Afghanistan


Korengal valley - A map


Stalemate in Korengal Valley - A NYTimes video


Battle Company Is Out There - an excellent reportage.


An ambush and a comrade lost


A night patrol in the Korengal valley


I'm still surprised that the US soldiers have to wear armor and so much equipment even in night patrols. The amount of fatigue casualities is rather worrying. It must be ordered top-down, but it makes such patrols mostly futile. I mean how do you want to surprise with a certain consistency the enemy if you have to call in the helicopter to medi-evac worn out men? It almost seems to be a bad joke.
yea you do have a good point
it is rather embarrising to have your troops medevaced because of fatigue and not an engagement
no offense to anyone seriously
but at the same time
most of that equipment you carry can come in use
 

Firn

Active Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4
yea you do have a good point
it is rather embarrising to have your troops medevaced because of fatigue and not an engagement
no offense to anyone seriously
but at the same time
most of that equipment you carry can come in use
The trouble lies in the mentality that "most of the equipment you carry can come in use". While I do not know the specific METT-TC, I wonder why soldiers are forced to carry so much at night and on very rough and difficult terrain that a substantial part of the patrol must be medevaced. It does seem to run counter to the scope of the mission. But than again US commanders have mostly been forced to enforce the wearing of a lot of PPE by the concern of casualities. This is perfectly fine and sensible most of the time, but in such cases as mentioned above?
 
Top