Go Back   DefenceTalk Forum - Military & Defense Forums > Global Defense & Military > Military Strategy and Tactics
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Hill-afb-f-35A--GBU-12_laser-guided-bomb-drop.jpg

humvee-us-army-stars.jpg

RF_13-3_Typhoon_FGR4_0697-1.JPG

RF_13-3_F-16_Aggressor_0731-1.JPG
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Modern Drone Tactics

This is a discussion on Modern Drone Tactics within the Military Strategy and Tactics forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; I hope this is the right place to ask but what's your opinion on drone usage for a modern military? ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old June 3rd, 2014   #1
Just Hatched
Private
Da Nang's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 5
Threads:
Modern Drone Tactics

I hope this is the right place to ask but what's your opinion on drone usage
for a modern military?

Personally, I think drones would make excellent ground support and workhorse aircraft if they were made cheaply and in enough numbers. They might even make
decent replacements for the retiring A-10s since what they lack in individual
firepower, they make up for in presence and numbers. They might also be
good for taking down an air defense network in a brute force kind of way.
So basically a low-tech complement to manned aircraft instead of high-tech
replacements. On the other hand, as demonstrated by Iran, non-autonomous drones will always be vulnerable to outside "interference" by persistent opponents.
But this all presupposes that countries can make capable drones at an affordable
price say 50 percent the performance of an F-16 at 35 percent of the price. Right
now, I think countries such as the US, France, and China are trying to put too much capability into individual drones and not emphasizing the fact that drones
are expendable. The RQ-9 reaper is an okay example, but the price at $20 mil. is still too high for what you're getting.

Again I'm new so please excuse me if someone has already posted
something like this.
Da Nang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2014   #2
Super Moderator
Lieutenant General
RobWilliams's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,751
Threads:
The first role of most modern UAVs (including the Reaper) is ISTAR, relatively it's a small percentage (10% for the RAF IIRC) of missions which result in a weapons release and even then it's more often than not on unsuspecting targets far into hostile territory than responding to a 'troops in contact' call.

Not really great for taking down an IADS either, they're great for operations in Afghanistan because they lack the ability to destroy or even locate the aircraft in the sky. Against a technologically competent aircraft both militarily and through cyber there are significant risks to UAVs which is why development of stealth UCAVs has been something seeing development, like the US UCLASS or RQ-170/180, the French nEuron or the UK Taranis.

These are not cheap, the main cost of aircraft like these are the electronic systems and capabilities. If the aim is to penetrate a proper IADS then i'd not imagine any cheap MALE/HALE UAVs which are not designed for that mission to last for any meaningful length of time.

Drones are not expendable, any drone worth anything will be too expensive to be deemed disposable IMO.
RobWilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2014   #3
Senior Member
Lieutenant Colonel
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,104
Threads:
The last thing any military wants is a fully autonomous UAV killbot that makes its own target selection. Either you would have to constrain its selection so much that it is easy to spoof, or open it up and accept high levels of collateral damage i.e. blue-on-blue and civilian deaths. It would also violate a number of international agreements (written for landmines and booby traps, but those are the only current fully autonomous weapon systems). If a human makes an error and orders a kill of an innocent target you can blame and replace him. When an autonomous UAV makes an error you are likely to have to ground the entire fleet until you can develop, test, and install a software patch, which could take months.

So you need a man-in-the-loop to authorize the attack. He needs a lot of sensor data to evaluate the situation before authorizing the attack. That takes a lot of bandwidth, which is in short supply, so you can only operate a few UAVs in a single communications “cell”.

Target identifications also requires a lot of expensive sensor hardware, probably even more in an autonomous UAV due to the limits of the software and the need to be sure of the target, possibly 60% or more of the total cost.

So fully autonomous armed UAV are out. Cheap large armed drones are out. And you are very limited in the number of operator controlled UAVs you can deploy.
My2Cents is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2014   #4
Just Hatched
Private
Da Nang's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 5
Threads:
I guess I'm too used to thinking of drones as
tomahawk missiles without the warhead. I was
thinking more along the lines of using MQ-1s to force
SAM sites to fire and expose themselves to SEAD aircraft.
Either you shoot at the drones and expose yourself
or don't shoot and let them do what they want.
While the issue of not having enough drone operators is
valid right now, I don't think it would be in serious wartime
if you gave someone the choice between being a drone
operator or being infantry. They'll learn quickly enough.
I dunno, I guess it just bugs me that you can get 2 MQ-1 Predators
for the price of an Abrams tank and possibly 30 of them for
the price of an F-35. An F-35 is great, but it can still only be in
one place at a time.
Da Nang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2014   #5
Super Moderator
Lieutenant General
RobWilliams's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,751
Threads:
A SAM site only has to be activated and transmitting any form of electronic signals of any kind (radar signals + other communications signals) to be picked up, analysed and nail to a location. It's not dependent on firing way beyond the range where visual identification would be able to be done.

Radar emissions at a certain point actually tell a potential target more than the origin of the emissions because past a certain point the radar does not create any meaningful picture however everybody knows there's a radar transmitting and a possible origin.
RobWilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 19th, 2014
rnn
This message has been deleted by OPSSG. Reason: Violation of forum rules - no one-liners
Old October 13th, 2015   #6
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5
Threads:
Drones

Actually drones are the weapons of modern war. Drones are one of the best inventions. Drones may save number of lives and can replace many fighter planes. By drones ground force can keep an eye on near by enemies. Drones are expensive but inventions are going on to make them cheaper and better. Hope we will have results soon.
Jay R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14th, 2015   #7
Defense Professional / Analyst
Sergeant
Blackshoe's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 237
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay R View Post
Actually drones are the weapons of modern war. Drones are one of the best inventions. Drones may save number of lives and can replace many fighter planes. By drones ground force can keep an eye on near by enemies. Drones are expensive but inventions are going on to make them cheaper and better. Hope we will have results soon.
Welcome to DT! Please go and read the stickies in the new member thread and introduce yourself there, as well.
Blackshoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 15th, 2015   #8
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5
Threads:
Thank you for suggestion!

I have introduced myself there.

A reminder to all posting in this thread. The posting of one-liners is a violation of Rule 2 of the Forum Rules. On occasion, the Mod Team may tolerate a post with one-line; but not all the time.

For new members or members with less than 50 posts, if you post a one-liner in this thread, it will be deleted. Thank you for your attention.

Last edited by OPSSG; March 8th, 2016 at 06:37 AM.
Jay R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2015   #9
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Carson, NV
Posts: 2
Threads:
Drone usage for a morden drone tectics

The U.S. military began experimenting with unmanned aircraft as early as World War I. By World War II, unmanned craft could be controlled by radio signals, usually from another aircraft. Vehicles that could return from a mission and be recovered appeared in the late 1950s. Today, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) perform a wide range of missions and are used by all four branches of the military.
andy_lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2016   #10
Defense Professional / Analyst
Lieutenant
No Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 631
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay R View Post
Actually drones are the weapons of modern war. Drones are one of the best inventions. Drones may save number of lives and can replace many fighter planes. By drones ground force can keep an eye on near by enemies. Drones are expensive but inventions are going on to make them cheaper and better. Hope we will have results soon.
Drones for want of a better word in ground combat are tools nothing more nothing less just like my rifle, real world considerations soon kick in and your tools start to pack up ie batteries go flat, dust & grit get in etc anything man made better be grunt proof light weight and small if not it will be left behind with all the other rubbish and that is a fact of life being a grunt.
Cadredave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2016   #11
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 16,499
Threads:
nobody in the military calls them drones.

the proper terminology is UAS.

the press uses the term drones and its completely inaccurate.

we've also moved beyond the issue of driving one over the battlefield to assist in forming the overall combat operating picture.

future UAS are already about the ability to use them as part of a broader sensor array

unfort the press just focus on the unmanned strike side of the capability

and they're far from being a new capability. they first hit their stride in the cold war, and then moved ahead at a rapid rate in the 70's.

predators and their kindred frames are an extension of developments that have already happened in the past.

UAS are for more than just the dr strangelove optic of killing a tracked object of interest
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
http://cofda.wordpress.com/

gf a.k.a. ROBOPIMP T5C
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #12
Defense Enthusiast
Chief Warrant Officer
Ranger25's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Si Vis Pacem. Para Bellum
Posts: 402
Threads:
Swarms

DARPA is working on developing tactics and uses for modern UAVs and going beyond individual MALE/HALE systems. They're looking at UAV "swarms" or small squadrons of UAVs acting in unison Mission profiles will vary but initial thoughts are to use against IADS as part of a networked force package. They're also looking into UAV swarms that can loiter searching for preprogrammed target profiles and attack as identified.

Here's some good articles on the idea. Personally, I see it as a potentially evolutionary concept

http://www.militaryaerospace.com/art...ne-swarms.html


The USN seems to be the current leader in technology and concept of operations development and have already tested swarming technology this year. The USN seems to be working with UAV swarms for counter A2D2 as well as surface warfare.


U.S. Navy Plans To Fly First Drone Swarm This Summer |
________________
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Ranger25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #13
Defense Professional / Analyst
Colonel
ASSAIL's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Darwin NT Australia
Posts: 1,540
Threads:
A very interesting concept which led to some basic thoughts on countering.

I've seen bird lovers firing off nets to trap swarms of birds, maybe some extension of this concept, delivered by basic missile, might prove effective if deployed before the swarm spreads too wide, particularly if the swarm is being controlled by/as a single operator/unit.

I'm looking forward to the development of both attack and defence tactics.
ASSAIL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #14
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 16,499
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASSAIL View Post
A very interesting concept which led to some basic thoughts on countering.

I've seen bird lovers firing off nets to trap swarms of birds, maybe some extension of this concept, delivered by basic missile, might prove effective if deployed before the swarm spreads too wide, particularly if the swarm is being controlled by/as a single operator/unit.

I'm looking forward to the development of both attack and defence tactics.
the swarm AI is interesting as it traced back to work done by CSIRO and DSTO with insects and birds
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
http://cofda.wordpress.com/

gf a.k.a. ROBOPIMP T5C
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #15
Defense Enthusiast
Chief Warrant Officer
Ranger25's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Si Vis Pacem. Para Bellum
Posts: 402
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gf0012-aust View Post
the swarm AI is interesting as it traced back to work done by CSIRO and DSTO with insects and birds
Yes Sir!

The USN remains at the cutting edge with DARPA close. I've also seen some data DARPA is working on networked "Swarming UUVs) as well. Could be another interesting capability that will need to worked into Operational Concepts
________________
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Ranger25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 PM.