This is a discussion on J-10 or no J-10 within the Military Photos & Videos forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; [img]http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=J-10+fighter/v=2/SID=w/l=IVI/SIG=12etimb5g/EXP=1104083323/*-http%3A//www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/j-10-takeoff.jpg[/img]
All I wanted to say is already on the pic. So any comments?...
i can see the distortions those marks are observable if you overlap the pics they are exactly the same. Just some really Poor PS job thats the reason i never trust Chinese websites.
They also created confusion with J-XX. Two different websites gave two different artistic impressions. In the end both websites took it off.
DT is one of the few right now that has the pics, both impressions.
________________ "It is better to accept an end with a horror then face horror with no end." - Karl Von Clausewitz
Thats good cuz here at DT we stand for authenticity and credibility in reporting defense and defense-equipment related information. We should keep those two impressions and this fake pic of J-10 to let the readers beware of such tricks. The web community would be glad I tell you.
________________
With passion and sacrifice, comes freedom!
Ultrafang, you leave us with the impression you didn't even read the thread. Everyone here is quite aware that the pic is a photoshopped Typhoon, and we all know what the J-10 looks like, thank you.
Ultrafang, you leave us with the impression you didn't even read the thread. Everyone here is quite aware that the pic is a photoshopped Typhoon, and we all know what the J-10 looks like, thank you.
I read it, and it looks like they are thinking it's a eurofighter-2000. Unless they are been sarcastic, but how am i supose to know they are been sarcastic.