Nato is bombing and killing civilians in Afghanistan

Status
Not open for further replies.

waraich

Banned Member
Nato is bombing and killing civilians in Afghanistan
Occupation forces in Afghanistan have admitted that they are regularly killing civilians in bombings raids when they say are targetting Taliban fighters.

According to Afghanistan’s Independent Human Rights Commission, over 270 civilians have been killed by Nato forces, which run the occupation, so far this year.

In the latest attack over 20 civilians were killed in an artillary barrage.

The rising toll of civilian deaths has forced occupation forces to rein in the number of attacks on villages.

Jaap de Hoop Scheffe, Nato’s secretary general, has blamed the deaths of civilians on the Afghan resistance.

He has now said that occupation forces will use smaller bombs in an effort to avoid civilian casualties.

War planes regularly drop 500 pound bombs on villages. The new order will mean that only 250 pound bombs will be used.

The change is supposed to protect civilians.

Yet any attack on villages where the homes are built out of mud and bricks will hurt ordinary people.

Last month, the US-backed Afghan president Hamid Karzai accused Nato of killing 90 civilians in air strikes and artillery fire.

Over 20 civilians were killed in the bombing raids of two districts in Helmand province in the south of the country in the most recent attacks.

The district chief of Girishk told the Reuters new agency that when Nato troops attacked, “Civilians began to flee and 27 or 28 of them were killed.”

A Nato commander justified the random killings.

He said that, “Because the Taliban don’t wear uniforms like us, as soon as they are killed, they are called civilians. The key is, are they male or female? If they are male, what age are they?”

Meanwhile the number of British troops being killed every month in Afghanistan has reached a similar level to those dying in Iraq.

The latest death of a British marine brings the total number of those killed to 68 since the occupation began.

Ten British soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan in the last two months. Fourteen soldiers have died in Iraq over the same period.

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=12638

If NATO could not perform its agenda of rehabilitation it should quit from Afghanistan but killing of innocient civilian is genocide.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
It's not genocide. It's collateral damage. And as cruel as that sounds, that's exactly what it is. Civilians aren't being targeted deliberately, the coalition forces just don't have very strict RoE.
 

waraich

Banned Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
It's not genocide. It's collateral damage. And as cruel as that sounds, that's exactly what it is. Civilians aren't being targeted deliberately, the coalition forces just don't have very strict RoE.


Is there any international law or UNO resolution which allow attack other country to catch any suspect?

There is no chance in near future that OBL will be caught or Al Qaida up rooted in Afghanistan ,why dont they change their startegy to make talaban friend to eliminate this evil .
 

Cooch

Active Member
Feanor is correct.

It is not genocide to kill a small number of civillians.
It is not genocide to inadvertently kill non-combatants.

It is true that the Taliban and associated groups are "civillian".

If we are to have a serious discussion regarding the morality and validity of tactics used in places such as Afghanistan, one of the prerequisites is that we are honest about what is occurring. The deliberate misuse of highly emotive terms such as "genocide" in order to denigrate certain parties is less than intellectually honest.

While it is almosdt certainly impossible to totally avoid non-coimbatant casualties in such conflicts as we are discussing, I doubt that there has ever been a greater commitment to the avoidance of unneccessary deaths than that displayed by the current generation of Western military forces.

Respectfully............... Peter
 

steve33

Member
Nato is bombing and killing civilians in Afghanistan
Occupation forces in Afghanistan have admitted that they are regularly killing civilians in bombings raids when they say are targetting Taliban fighters.

According to Afghanistan’s Independent Human Rights Commission, over 270 civilians have been killed by Nato forces, which run the occupation, so far this year.

In the latest attack over 20 civilians were killed in an artillary barrage.

The rising toll of civilian deaths has forced occupation forces to rein in the number of attacks on villages.

Jaap de Hoop Scheffe, Nato’s secretary general, has blamed the deaths of civilians on the Afghan resistance.

He has now said that occupation forces will use smaller bombs in an effort to avoid civilian casualties.

War planes regularly drop 500 pound bombs on villages. The new order will mean that only 250 pound bombs will be used.

The change is supposed to protect civilians.

Yet any attack on villages where the homes are built out of mud and bricks will hurt ordinary people.

Last month, the US-backed Afghan president Hamid Karzai accused Nato of killing 90 civilians in air strikes and artillery fire.

Over 20 civilians were killed in the bombing raids of two districts in Helmand province in the south of the country in the most recent attacks.

The district chief of Girishk told the Reuters new agency that when Nato troops attacked, “Civilians began to flee and 27 or 28 of them were killed.”

A Nato commander justified the random killings.

He said that, “Because the Taliban don’t wear uniforms like us, as soon as they are killed, they are called civilians. The key is, are they male or female? If they are male, what age are they?”

Meanwhile the number of British troops being killed every month in Afghanistan has reached a similar level to those dying in Iraq.

The latest death of a British marine brings the total number of those killed to 68 since the occupation began.

Ten British soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan in the last two months. Fourteen soldiers have died in Iraq over the same period.

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=12638

If NATO could not perform its agenda of rehabilitation it should quit from Afghanistan but killing of innocient civilian is genocide.
Killing innocent civilians is genocide well what do you think the worlds [Admin: text deleted. Find another descriptor to use please]have made a career of doing they kill civilians on purpose and also use them as human shields as well as send brain washed un educated people as suicide bombers.

The western forces neeed to take more care with there bombing personally i wouldn,t drop bombs on these villages unless i knew they were clear of civilians i would bide my time waiting to catch the Taliban outside the villages we have the ability to lay low observe them and wait they can,t stay in these villages for ever and then we can strike them.

The killings undermine our efforts but to start throwing around the word genocide is simply crap.

It is the [Admin: text deleted. Find another descriptor to use please] who target civilians on purpose it is they you should be pointing the finger at.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top