This is a discussion on Largest Army, Navy, and Airforce within the Geo-strategic Issues forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Can someone give me the rankings of the worlds largest, Army, Navy, and Airforce? thankss...
Thanks for the list. The UK were better off than i originally thought. The USA, USAF, USMC & USN I think you will find these 2 "air-forces" are in the top 4 of the worlds air-forces. And certainly the best equipped and supported, with large numbers of F-16, F-15, F-18, B1, B2, B-52, EW planes, and the list goes on.
The USN is the worlds only tier one navy I truly believe it could take on the rest of the world navies and win. It has the number, the weapons, the training, the largest carrier force (11), sub force and among the best weapons systems and sensors in the world. Also, a massive number of towed array ships with plenty of up to date ASW helos
US-Army, it not as big as others, however, it is the best supported and overall best equipped and supported. Net work centric systems, there Armour has been somewhat neglected, but so has the rest of the worlds, save the Chinese. Also, remember the Americans;s have lots of combat experience, even on a medium to large scale and they have the money to train more.
Thanks for the list. The UK were better off than i originally thought. The USA, USAF, USMC & USN I think you will find these 2 "air-forces" are in the top 4 of the worlds air-forces. And certainly the best equipped and supported, with large numbers of F-16, F-15, F-18, B1, B2, B-52, EW planes, and the list goes on.
The USN is the worlds only tier one navy I truly believe it could take on the rest of the world navies and win. It has the number, the weapons, the training, the largest carrier force (11), sub force and among the best weapons systems and sensors in the world. Also, a massive number of towed array ships with plenty of up to date ASW helos
US-Army, it not as big as others, however, it is the best supported and overall best equipped and supported. Net work centric systems, there Armour has been somewhat neglected, but so has the rest of the worlds, save the Chinese. Also, remember the Americans;s have lots of combat experience, even on a medium to large scale and they have the money to train more.
any thoughts
I would add that the US is also very good at fighting in combined operations. Funny, how many compare one weapons system to another. In reality its much more complicated. With many factors to consider..................The US fights as a combined force. (i.e. Land ,Sea, and Air) Attacking from all directions. Thereby overwhelming its enemies defenses!
Ranking armies under such titles as the "biggest and smallest" is an absolute waste of time.
there are a myriad of factors that determine battle competency. Size is the least important.
I agree to a point! While much smaller armies have fought and won against much larger adversaries. Yet, in the final out come. They usually the end up losing....................
I agree we should discuss training and logistics. China mite have a larger airforce and army then India and the UK, but both are far more effective because having more modern aircraft and tanks, much better training, and effective logistics.
It goes back to the Cold War ideas, the Soviets had the numbers, the US and NATO had the quality.
I agree we should discuss training and logistics. China mite have a larger airforce and army then India and the UK, but both are far more effective because having more modern aircraft and tanks, much better training, and effective logistics.
It goes back to the Cold War ideas, the Soviets had the numbers, the US and NATO had the quality.
i doubt if tanks would be of any use to china against india or taiwan since they have to cross natural barriers(mountains and the ocean),where china realy lacks as of now is that they dont not have large quantities of genuine heavy attack helicopters.
In many ways the Gulf War was the corner stone for the ranking of modern militaries. Iraq could have been many armies in the top 20, from many countries. It was also the military alliance that would have stopped the Soviets from over-running western Europe. The Gulf War was also NATO at its most powerful. It should come as no surprise that "quality wise" the military's aligned with the USA are the finest in the world in terms of equipment,doctrine,training, and logistics.
The Generals in China were aghast when they saw the 21'st century juggernaut of the Gulf Alliance slaughter the Iraqis in a manner that wasnt even entertaining. Up till then they thought sheer "numbers" still meant something and they rushed pell-mell into the technology race. They figured out that to strangle them all an enemy had to do was strangle their sea lanes. And it was only technology/training that could save them.
But for sheer "capability" ? From A to Z? The only military's that can match the countries in the NATO and ANZUS ,or other, alliances would probably be Israel and, at one time, South Africa. I wouldn't even add the Russians to the list.
China is not that bad off. It doesnt only have numbers but is growing in the terms of technology. Not only that, it has the worlds second largest defense budget. That means it could buy about any new technology that is coming out. No need to under estamate the Chinese.
China has the largest standing army, and I think the US have the largest navy and airforce.
Yes you are right USA has the largest navy as well as largest in the world.
I want to tell that It,s navy largest no. of subs in the world which are more then 80 and it has largest no. of aircrafts.