Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Geo-Strategic Defense
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

-77689755705287080691.jpg

-7768975570528708069.jpg

Ural_Taifun_V-day_parade_Yekaterinburg.jpg

Kamaz_Taifun_at_trials.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





Women in Combat Arms

This is a discussion on Women in Combat Arms within the Geo-Strategic Defense forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Originally Posted by Kilo 2-3 UK_Army, that isn't strictly true. Women in the modern military do struggle with rape and ...


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old December 8th, 2010   #16
Defense Enthusiast
Chief Warrant Officer
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 459
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilo 2-3 View Post
UK_Army, that isn't strictly true. Women in the modern military do struggle with rape and sexual harassment, especially while on deployment. The system in place exists because there's a serious problem.

rip, any solid evidence on your claims? You make a pretty radical point and I'm curious to know what you're basing it one.
I do not know how radical I am. If fact I am more of a traditional type probably out of step with the times i.e. preferring reality over theory. It has been a long time since I was in the Navy but I was there when the US Navy first started putting woman on ships. Not combat ships at first. It was the USS Hope a hospital ship they started out with up in San Francisco and though I was not stations on it, I was close and everyone including the male part of the crew of the USS Hope called it a floating Bordello. But that was a long time ago when they were just first trying it out so that observation may not be fair
.
When we talk about the Navy we have to make it clear which Navy we are talking about. I do not mean which county but which part of the US Navy you are taking about because the different parts can be quite different. There may not be great problems with female personal in many parts of the Navy. There doesn’t seem to be many problems with the shore based personal or in the positions that are like regular jobs everywhere except that you wear a uniform. But there is problems for those that go to sea in ships and not all of those problems are equally distributed.
The smaller the ship, the fewer the crew, the long the deployments, and the more specialized the skills needed to run the ship, the greater the problems. For instances there are fewer problems on Carriers (big ship/big crew) than on Cursers (Smaller ship/smaller crew). There are few problems In the Sea lift command (big ship/small crew) compared to Minesweepers (small ship/small crew). Where this pattern hits the hardest is in Guided missile Destroyers and Cursers. The tip of the spire as they say of the US Navy. Where you have small ships with little spare room inside them, relatively small crews for what they have to do, and so many specialties to run them that there is very little in the way of bacup personal wise.
As to my sources of information? Well I know and talk to the guys that are still in the Navy. I used to live in San Diego for a long time and even though I no longer now work in ships the Navy and the people living it have been a lifelong interest to me and will be until the day that I die. I am even willing a buy a guy a drink or two just to keep up on what is going on, talk across the backyard fence, and the like. Since I was at one time, one of them they can be quit frank as we swap our sea stories and this is what they say it is like.
The hardest part is not for the young sailor seeing the world for the first time but for the guy with ten or twelve years in, and he has spent 80% of this time at sea or in overhauls (which really, really, sucks by the way) or in shakedowns, RUFFTRY, or some such predeployment testing and training and his wife is going to divorce him if he can’t get shore duty but he keeps getting extended because the woman on board don’t or don’t stay deployed.
rip is offline  
Old December 30th, 2010   #17
Just Hatched
Private
dtleio's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: God bless China
Posts: 10
Threads:
It is evil to let woman in combat, they should back to home,take care of kids and bring them up.
Losing a woman in the battle, one kid also lose a great mother together.
The WAR not welcome woman.
dtleio is offline  
Old December 30th, 2010   #18
Junior Member
Private First Class
No Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 64
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtleio View Post
It is evil to let woman in combat, they should back to home,take care of kids and bring them up.
Losing a woman in the battle, one kid also lose a great mother together.
The WAR not welcome woman.
Although that's your opinion, that view really has no place in a modern society where everyone's rights should be respected, if someone chooses to serve that choice should be respected regardless of a minorities wishes to push their views on everyone.
jeffb is offline  
Old December 31st, 2010
MOSID
This message has been deleted by OPSSG. Reason: Spam like post whoring, with a post that is filled with a bunch of nonsense in violation of forum rules
Old January 1st, 2011   #19
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 12,293
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtleio View Post
It is evil to let woman in combat, they should back to home,take care of kids and bring them up.
Losing a woman in the battle, one kid also lose a great mother together.
The WAR not welcome woman.
Perhaps you should look at converting your own countries recruiting policies first.... before criticising others....

besides, occupational or philosophical misogyny is not exactly welcome here....
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
gf0012-aust is offline  
Old January 1st, 2011   #20
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 16
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffb View Post
Although that's your opinion, that view really has no place in a modern society where everyone's rights should be respected, if someone chooses to serve that choice should be respected regardless of a minorities wishes to push their views on everyone.
But don't u think it's kinda low to use women in combat? We men are the warriors, we do all the the killings and battles for centuries. Besides, they're better in kitchen than in the army.
Bastian is offline  
Old January 1st, 2011   #21
Junior Member
Private First Class
No Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 64
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bastian View Post
But don't u think it's kinda low to use women in combat? We men are the warriors, we do all the the killings and battles for centuries. Besides, they're better in kitchen than in the army.
This thread is going nowhere fast. It doesn't matter what your personal opinion is, in a free society each person has a right to make their own choices for their own life.

If a woman chooses to serve then she should be treated to the same respect given to male soldiers.
jeffb is offline  
Old January 1st, 2011   #22
Super Moderator
Colonel
No Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,318
Threads:
A general warning to all that the quality of this thread needs to improve dramatically if it's to stay open. If people want to make childish cracks about women in the military, they can do it elsewhere. That goes for everyone in here. Display some maturity, for god's sake.
Bonza is offline  
Old January 1st, 2011   #23
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 12,293
Threads:
Thread closed. 3 members banned.

http://defencetalk.com/forums/rules.php

multiple rules breached. I suggest that some refresh their understanding of said rules if they intend returning after banning period expires.
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
gf0012-aust is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 PM.