US renews request for pakistani troops

adsH

New Member
ISLAMABAD, April 12: The US government has made a renewed request to Pakistan for sending its troops to Iraq as part of a multinational UN force that may be dispatched there after the transfer of power in June, Dawn learnt on Monday.
US ambassador in Islamabad Ms Nancy Powell conveyed Washington's new request for Pakistani troops during a recent meeting at the Foreign Office here, diplomatic sources said.

"US has approached Pakistan again for contribution of troops for a potential UN force after the transfer of power," these sources told Dawn, adding that Pakistan had made no commitments yet.

Pakistan's stated position on this question has been that it would only consider sending troops to Iraq under the UN umbrella. Last year when the US government asked for a contribution of 10,000 troops Pakistan reiterated this position.

The US-led occupation forces are scheduled to formally hand over power to an interim Iraqi government on June 30. US Secretary of State Colin Powell has made it clear that the Bush administration would stick to its June 30 target for handover of power to an Iraqi transitional government.

However, the Democrats have warned the Bush administration about the timing, saying the plans to transfer power in June may unleash a civil war. The US is expected to push for a UN resolution calling for a multinational force in Iraq ahead of the June 30 deadline.

The US State Department confirmed last week that Washington was in regular contact with some dozen new countries, including India and Bangladesh, for contribution of troops to Iraq.

Pakistan, Bangladesh and India are among the five leading contributors to the UN peacekeeping operations around the world with Pakistan currently topping the list.

Meanwhile, for the US the job in Iraq is getting tougher with the fresh spate of attacks across the country. A slow and steady depletion through casualties of its own troops is making Washington feel the need for foreign troops even more.

The Bush administration has come under scathing attack from the international community and human rights organizations for its unilateral adventurism in Iraq that has led to a humanitarian crisis and worsened the security situation there.
 

lamdacore

New Member
this just proves that the US needs help in Iraq. I just don't understand why the US wants to burden other nations with their unjustified attacks. the US attacks and then it can't handle it. this makes US's look lame! It is a good thing that pakistan is not sending troops under US pressure and will only send it if the UN takes a role. I think the superpower can handle the mess it created otherwise they don't deserve that status!
 

Gremlin29

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
With the amount of money (Billions of US dollars) that America doles out to her "supposed" allies I don't think expecting some help is out of line at all.
 

lamdacore

New Member
it will be very interesting to know where those "BILLIIONS" of US dollars have gone after an ARMS EMBARGO and other types too on the SUPPOSEDLY ALLIES!! Please enlighten me! anyone!!
 

adsH

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #6
Roger Smith said:
[Mod edit: Roger ji please stop this mud slinging.]
Pakistan will not be providing "mercenaries" wishful thinkers !! those soldiers are going to be a part of the POST hand-over UN mandated Troops (if pakistan does decide to participate) (Pakistan provides the largest UN mandated Stabalization Force in the World ) so US can except some help from Pakistan to help in the Peace keeping Areana after the Sovereignty hand-over. they will not be Combat "mercenaries" !!
"supplying its soldiers to Iraq" those soldiers are not for Iraq (government) they are for The UN which will decide what to do with them when they have them in there control obviously Pakistan will be told what there Soldiers will be used for to let them decide in advance and to let them think it over!!
I am sure the UN force will also have Indian Troops Bengalis if they decide to contribute but traditionally Pakistan has supplied troops in large amounts
 

lamdacore

New Member
one of the reasons why a number of nations are not joining the US in any of its coalitions is because if the US can't handle it how will other poor nations will. a good example is what is happeing with the japanese!

helping pakistan with 1.7 billion dollars in health services has been very much appreciated and is probably one of the reasons why pakistan still backs US in some ways. at the same time the US hits pakistan with embargos and sanctions. its as if the US hits with one hand and heals with the other. ITS PRETTY ABSURD!! nice treatment for the US allies.
 

adsH

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #8
lamdacore said:
one of the reasons why a number of nations are not joining the US in any of its coalitions is because if the US can't handle it how will other poor nations will. a good example is what is happeing with the japanese!

helping pakistan with 1.7 billion dollars in health services has been very much appreciated and is probably one of the reasons why pakistan still backs US in some ways. at the same time the US hits pakistan with embargos and sanctions. its as if the US hits with one hand and heals with the other. ITS PRETTY ABSURD!! nice treatment for the US allies.
well Pakistan is the most Punished and oldest allie in the region !! lol
 
Top