UK: Half of all recruits to Army read at level of 11-year-olds

mysterious

New Member
Half of all recruits to Army read at level of 11-year-olds
By Sean Rayment, Defence Correspondent
(Filed: 28/03/2004)


A confidential study into the educational standards of soldiers has revealed that half of all new infantry recruits only have the reading and writing skills of 11-year-olds.

The study commissioned by the Ministry of Defence, which the Telegraph has seen, also discloses that a fifth of recruits have the literacy and numeracy levels of seven-year-olds. Four per cent are at the standard of the average five-year-old.

Among the problems uncovered were one soldier who admitted that he struggled to write letters to his young daughter and another who wrote "riht" for write, "cepe" instead of keep, and "rifel" for rifle.

The findings have raised fears among defence chiefs that soldiers of the future may not be able to operate the new generation of "smart" weapon systems that will dictate how battles are fought. Officers, who are more highly qualified, were not included in the study.

Within the next 10 years, the Army will be issued with equipment that will require all frontline soldiers to be computer literate and numerically literate if they are to fight and survive on the battlefield. They will also need to be able to read and understand ever-more complicated training manuals.

By 2010, the Ministry of Defence plans to equip the Army with a new fleet of armoured vehicles linked by a computer network and equipped with the most sophisticated weapons, communications and target-finding equipment available.

The £2 billion programme will become a cornerstone of the Army and will be used by basic tank and infantry soldiers, who will require a high degree of computer literacy to operate it.

The study into the educational standards of recruits was based on the results of 2,000 basic skills assessments of new privates compiled by Melanie Dickinson, a civilian instructor at the Infantry Training Centre in Catterick, North Yorkshire.

It reveals that four per cent of new recruits possessed a basic skill level equivalent to a five-year-old; 20 per cent equivalent to a seven-year-old; 50 per cent equivalent to an 11-year-old and 26 per cent had literacy levels equivalent to GCSE grades D to G in English and mathematics.

The reports states that there is a growing belief within the Army that believes that soldiers should be screened at recruiting centres for basic skills and those who are not up to an acceptable standard should be rejected.

Ms Dickinson admits, however, that this could create problems. "This could mean that the infantry would lose at least 25 per cent of its recruits in one go - and my own experience of 16 years in the Army tells me that you would also lose many good soldiers."

The report adds: "Nowadays there are very few soldiers who are entirely illiterate or innumerate, but there are a lot of soldiers who can't cope with the level of written information they are expected to understand."

The report goes on to say that the lowest educational level at which soldiers are accepted into the Army, called Basic Skills Level 1, is "widely accepted as the minimum level required to work and function in society in general".

No educational qualifications are necessary for privates seeking to join the Army, except for those who wish to train in technical trades such as signals, the Army Air Corps or the the various corps of engineers.

An applicant's suitability for a particular form of employment is determined by the results of an initial assessment, using computer touch-screen questions and answers.

A senior Army officer told the Telegraph: "Just because soldiers have literacy or numeracy issues, it does not mean they are stupid. Some of these individuals have very high IQs but they have been very poorly educated. There are soldiers serving in the SAS who struggle with reading and writing, yet they survive and become first-class soldiers, but they are the exception.

"The problem the Army faces is that the demands of modern military technology means that soldiers must possess more than the most basic of educational skills.

"In the very near future the basic infantryman will have to operate satellite navigation and target acquisition equipment in highly stressful conditions. If he can't read and write very well he will struggle to make the grade."



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...mil28.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/03/28/ixhome.html
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
One of the things that the US learned out of vietnam was that they needed an educated military, they have pumped a lot into making sure that their troops are of a minimum education standard.

The educational level of US and Australian troops has changed markedly over the last 30 years.

I'm surprised at the above, I would have assumed that the UK was on top of this. especially in light of the rapidly changing technology requirements that modern soldiers need to deal with. the next 5-10 years will be especially demanding.
 

adsH

New Member
hey mate 11 yr old are not bad in literacy lol here we have GCSE which are must here if u don't have them u can't get into the military i am sure of that when i was in the military recruiting office here there was a person sitting next to me who was nice chap but i think abit weepy he was trying to make it into the military but they kept on rejecting him because he wasn't presentable enough plus his gcse result sucked and he flunked the strict amplitude test English language test that wasn’t even an officer requirement so please before u go on telling me that check out the facts report are misleading in many ways.
i hardly think British army would send out Idiots on the field u need a head and a good understanding of literacy and command of English to operate equipment and communicate

plus if u look at the dotor's hand writing they are no shakes pear either this is what happens when u have to rite thousands of reports.
 

mysterious

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #6
Just like the article says, the soldiers of (specially) the developed world would need a much higher educational standard as otherwise, they would not be able to make efficient use of the smart weapons (that are more or less likely to be introduced in the recent future). Even present day soldiers suffer 'cuz of low educational standards such as in peace-keeping missions as well as current Iraq and Afghanistan missions. Just imagine, you're in an alien country and dont know how to properly read or write. I cant even imagine that! :smokingc: So my point is, its not always about how good you can shoot or what ever, these things 'majorly' count!
 

adsH

New Member
lol good point but thats why we have Officers who hapen to be grads in most cases or have gone through basic OT at some of the best Oficer training schools in the UK.
 

mysterious

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #8
Well I dont think every soldier has an officer in his knapsack to answer questions 24/7! :D Its about time soldiers stopped asking stupid questions and used their own minds more than ever before during operations and that can only be achieved if they have good educational background. :smokingc:
 

adsH

New Member
mysterious said:
Well I dont think every soldier has an officer in his knapsack to answer questions 24/7! :D Its about time soldiers stopped asking stupid questions and used their own minds more than ever before during operations and that can only be achieved if they have good educational background. :smokingc:
thats the trick u have officers to lead and u have GI's to do the manual work it maintains order the structure is intact less individual thinking less mutinees lol :D
 

webmaster

Troll Hunter
Staff member
:idea: People, don't forget to post/write your own opinion/views about the article you are posting.
 

DRUB

New Member
I believe the problem with education levels in armed forces is a small one. With increasing demands on soldiers to understand complex situations in the battlefield as well as in peace keeping, the armed forces are basically shooting themselves in teh foot if they recruit less than capable people.

Keep in mind though, accuracy of the tests often dont reflect how good a soldier is going ot be.
 

umair

Peace Enforcer
Well adsh u have to keep in mind that even straight As in GCSE(like u'rs truly! :D ) don't necessarily guarantee great handwriting.If u guys looked at my handwriting, I'm sure u'll rate it worse than the specimen above.Reading skills is something else.
In my opinion it's reading & technical skills which matter for a soldier.He must be able to read and digest the info he gets from tactics manuals, weaponry manuals etc.
 

adil

New Member
i think its just like the Vietnam war, where the US sent people to fight who it thought werent 'socially useful', which included many illiterates and black men
 
Top