Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Army & Security Forces
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

-77689755705287080691.jpg

-7768975570528708069.jpg

Ural_Taifun_V-day_parade_Yekaterinburg.jpg

Kamaz_Taifun_at_trials.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





PUMA - Ultimate IFV presented

This is a discussion on PUMA - Ultimate IFV presented within the Army & Security Forces forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Originally Posted by eckherl Yes, even though the launcher will have limited elevation this should not matter because the missile ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old July 8th, 2009   #226
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by eckherl View Post
Yes, even though the launcher will have limited elevation this should not matter because the missile is NLOS capable.
The newer version of Puma ... There appears to be a sight that is placed over the commanders direct vision pan sight. Wonder what it's for?
Cobra 1 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 8th, 2009   #227
Defense Professional / Analyst
General
Waylander's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein
Posts: 4,416
Threads:
This is not an additional sight but the IR-emitter for the MUSS soft-kill defense system.
Waylander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 10th, 2009   #228
Banned Member
Colonel
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,453
Threads:
The recent announcement by the Canadian Government regarding armoured upgrades includes a tracked AFV to compliment the new Leopards. Based on their recent experiences in A-Stan an M113 upgrade is unlikely and the two favoured options are CV90 or Puma. CV90 (according to reports) is currently favourate because it's already been combat tested in theatre by the Danes, it's also one of the two contenders for FRES recce fitted with a new 40mm turret. However that said, based on the Leopard sales success to Canada, Puma has a good chance of being selected, with or without an unmanned turret. It could be the first export success.

I wonder whether the Germans intend deploying Puma to replace the Marders recently depolyed to A-Stan in the near future?
riksavage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 10th, 2009   #229
Junior Member
Private First Class
Onkel's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 76
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by riksavage View Post

I wonder whether the Germans intend deploying Puma to replace the Marders recently depolyed to A-Stan in the near future?
I bet, this won´t be going to happen during within the next 3 Years. At first production has to start, the Puma have to be delivered and troops have to be fitted with them. Because troops are rotating from different units to A-stan, the Bundeswehr will wait until several bataillons are fitted with Puma. The Marder 1 A 5 deployed to A-stan will have to do their job a bit longer.
Onkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 10th, 2009   #230
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Threads:
Puma, CCV, and GCV

Quote:
Originally Posted by riksavage View Post
The recent announcement by the Canadian Government regarding armoured upgrades includes a tracked AFV to compliment the new Leopards. Based on their recent experiences in A-Stan an M113 upgrade is unlikely and the two favoured options are CV90 or Puma. CV90 (according to reports) is currently favourate because it's already been combat tested in theatre by the Danes, it's also one of the two contenders for FRES recce fitted with a new 40mm turret. However that said, based on the Leopard sales success to Canada, Puma has a good chance of being selected, with or without an unmanned turret. It could be the first export success.

I wonder whether the Germans intend deploying Puma to replace the Marders recently depolyed to A-Stan in the near future?

I noted in an earlier news item BAE is teamed with DEW Engineering on a CCV effort. Wonder if that might be connected at all with the CV90 possibility?
Also, even w/ Puma unmanned turret, (and carrying only 3 + 6 soldiers) how many dismounts might the CCV require?
Finally, will be interesting to see what common requirements there might be between Canada's CCV, the US GCV, and what Puma already meets.
Cobra 1 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 11th, 2009   #231
Defense Professional / Analyst
General
eckherl's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,268
Threads:
Puma priority will go to the Germans not giving Canada a oppurtunity for at least 3 years if not more, plus the cost factor will turn the Canadians away. CV90 will most likely be a better choice for them.
________________
"Here, across death`s other river
The Tartar horsemen shake their spears"
eckherl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 PM.