The Next Infantry Assault rifle for the United States
This is a discussion on The Next Infantry Assault rifle for the United States within the Army & Security Forces forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; The thing is, is that the M16a1,a2,a3,a4 and the M4 Carbine will soon be very outdated, with Russia developing more ...
The Next Infantry Assault rifle for the United States
The thing is, is that the M16a1,a2,a3,a4 and the M4 Carbine will soon be very outdated, with Russia developing more complex Kalashnikov variants and the rest of NATO moving on to new weapons being produced in Europe.
There was while testing for the XM8 assault riffle, however was canceled.
I believe that the next candidate for a new Infantry riffle of the United States is the SCAR-L which is already in a lot of use in the US army rangers.
Not only that the SCAR 'variants' can be deployed as Assault and Heavy Battle riffles as well as CQB and CQBR forms
I want to know if there are any other better options?
What do you think
Last edited by Preceptor; March 4th, 2010 at 01:18 AM.
Reason: Mod edit: title spelling correction
The thing is, is that the M16a1,a2,a3,a4 and the M4 Carbine will soon be very outdated, with Russia developing more complex Kalashnikov variants and the rest of NATO moving on to new weapons being produced in Europe.
There was while testing for the XM8 assault riffle, however was canceled.
I believe that the next candidate for a new Infantry riffle of the United States is the SCAR-L which is already in a lot of use in the US army rangers.
Not only that the SCAR 'variants' can be deployed as Assault and Heavy Battle riffles as well as CQB and CQBR forms
I want to know if there are any other better options?
What do you think
The Heckler & Koch HK416 (5.56mm) and HK417 (7.62mm) rifles are in use with Delta Force I believe, and in addition the company was recently selected for the USMC Infantry Automatic Rifle (or IAR) competition, using a variant of the HK416. So this weapon's got pretty good inroads into the US military and we may see more of them as time goes on (some believe the IAR program is an attempt to sneak a new Marine Corps standard-issue service rifle in the back door, for example).
Looking further toward the future though (caseless ammunition etc), it would probably be worth your while checking out any info you can on the Lightweight Small Arms Technologies program. Here's a quick link I googled up if you feel like reading further:
Other than that I'm not really sure, it's probably worth researching some of the technologies relevant to the LSAT program though, seems like interesting stuff
I believe the SCAR has a better chance of becoming the standard battle rifle for the Army since it is being used and hopefully proven by the Rangers. FN also has a good history with the US, more so than H&K. Lastly I've handled both and my non-expert opinion is that given the choice, I'd take the SCAR. In a perfect world we would see a rifle that could shoot as well as the M16A1 with the simplicity and realiability of the legendary AK/AKM (my favorite battle rifle platform). I think the SCAR comes closer to this than the 416.
I think the problem facing the 416 is that it looks pretty much like what it is, a super duper improved version of the same old platform. I reallize this is an over simplfication of the weapon however it is, what it is. If I were a betting man my money would still be on the SCAR, primarily because of it's current use in the Army community and more specifically with the Rangers. They are a step closer to being light infantry than SF who have a more peculiar mission and need and hence the SCAR is likely to get more exposure/attention as a potential battle rifle. I guess someday the antique M4 will get replaced (XM8 almost did that a few years back) but it still has many fans.
I think the problem facing the 416 is that it looks pretty much like what it is, a super duper improved version of the same old platform. I reallize this is an over simplfication of the weapon however it is, what it is. If I were a betting man my money would still be on the SCAR, primarily because of it's current use in the Army community and more specifically with the Rangers. They are a step closer to being light infantry than SF who have a more peculiar mission and need and hence the SCAR is likely to get more exposure/attention as a potential battle rifle. I guess someday the antique M4 will get replaced (XM8 almost did that a few years back) but it still has many fans.
Is there at all any possibility that perhaps H&K will offer up a weapon perhaps even more better than the SCAR in financial and performance terms
The Bushmaster Adaptive Combat Rifle(ACR), formerly known as Magpul Masada, is also in the game as far as I know. So far, SCAR has only been issued to a few select units under USSOCM. I wouldn't say it's got the army contrac in the bag just yet.
On a side note, I think I'll go purchase an ACR in March when it's available in Canada. From what I been hearing at the gun club, the price will only be around $1500CDN, which is a bargain considering AR-15 cost more than $1700 here.
Update: Ok Bushmaster and Remington decided to screw over the consumers. Originally Magpul said the gun will cost $1500CDN, but now Bushmaster is saying they up'ed the price tag to $2600. Looks like my next purchase will be a Stag Arms AR-15 with rails instead.
________________ Marriage is an important part of getting ahead. It lets people know you’re not a homo. A married guy seems more stable. People see the ring, they think “at least somebody can stand the son of a bitch.” Ladies see the ring, they know immediately that you must have some cash, and your cock must work.
Last edited by Pathfinder-X; January 26th, 2010 at 04:14 AM.
The thing is, is that the M16a1,a2,a3,a4 and the M4 Carbine will soon be very outdated, with Russia developing more complex Kalashnikov variants and the rest of NATO moving on to new weapons being produced in Europe.
There was while testing for the XM8 assault riffle, however was canceled.
I believe that the next candidate for a new Infantry riffle of the United States is the SCAR-L which is already in a lot of use in the US army rangers.
Not only that the SCAR 'variants' can be deployed as Assault and Heavy Battle riffles as well as CQB and CQBR forms
I want to know if there are any other better options?
What do you think
Yep the Rangers do have 1800 SCAR's as of right now, no doubt they will buy more.
Also don't forget in addition to the SCAR-L they also have the SCAR-H too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonza
(some believe the IAR program is an attempt to sneak a new Marine Corps standard-issue service rifle in the back door, for example).
Thats because of current DoD politics, you can't just ask for a new rifle you have to get one through the back door because of all the lobbyist from Colt(who only care about their profits).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gremlin29
I believe the SCAR has a better chance of becoming the standard battle rifle for the Army since it is being used and hopefully proven by the Rangers. FN also has a good history with the US, more so than H&K. Lastly I've handled both and my non-expert opinion is that given the choice, I'd take the SCAR. In a perfect world we would see a rifle that could shoot as well as the M16A1 with the simplicity and realiability of the legendary AK/AKM (my favorite battle rifle platform). I think the SCAR comes closer to this than the 416.
I favor the SCAR-L/H over the 416 IMO.
But the AK/AKM is an assault rifle not a battle rifle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pathfinder-X
The Bushmaster Adaptive Combat Rifle(ACR), formerly known as Magpul Masada, is also in the game as far as I know. So far, SCAR has only been issued to a few select units under USSOCM. I wouldn't say it's got the army contrac in the bag just yet.
On a side note, I think I'll go purchase an ACR in March when it's available in Canada. From what I been hearing at the gun club, the price will only be around $1500CDN, which is a bargain considering AR-15 cost more than $4000 here.
The Army effort is aimed at making the 5.56mm weapon shoot cleaner and straighter, and with higher rates of fire. The service is awaiting Defense Department approval to launch a competition to find a new carbine, with weapons officials identifying six interim fixes intended to address shortcomings in the M4’s reliability, durability and handling.
The overhaul proposals include:
• Adding a heavier barrel for better performance during high rates of fire.
• Replacing the direct-impingement gas system with a piston gas system.
• Improving the trigger pull.
• Incorporating an improved rail system for increased strength.
• Adding ambidextrous controls.
• Adding a round counter to track the total number of bullets fired over the weapon’s lifetime.
The upgrades to the M4 look nice an all but its still based of of the AR-15/416 platform. Almost 50 years later I think something new needs to come, like the SCAR-L/H or the Bushmaster ACR both of those are great assault rifles.
________________
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing."
I think this new "Assault Riffle" will need to have not just the light and portable qualities of the M4 but also, and this is just a guess on my part, perhaps a larger round, or a system with the option to fire different calibers
________________
When many people look at a weapon they see death, when I look at a weapon I see art
I think this new "Assault Riffle" will need to have not just the light and portable qualities of the M4 but also, and this is just a guess on my part, perhaps a larger round, or a system with the option to fire different calibers
I'm all for the 6.8 SPC or the 6.5 Grendel(preferable). Now if the military could get the OK from the DoD....
________________
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing."
Lets face it since most soldiers are armed with the 5.56, they will all tell that the stopping power is not too good.
The 5.56 has been proven a better choice for killing people, over larger calibers because of its rotation after entering the human body. But many Soldiers still prefer to make clean holes and pierce thinker armor (Cover) with rounds like the 7.62*39 or 7.62*51
