Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Army & Security Forces
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Project_12411_Missile_Boat_Zarechniy_36th_Missile_Boat_Bde.jpg

Project_12411TR-257_Missile_boat_36th_Missile_Boat_Bde.jpg

Project_12341_MRKs_Geyzer_and_Zuib_36th_Missile_Boat_Bde.jpg

Project_12341_MRK_Geyser_36th_Missile_Boat_Bde.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





Australian Army Discussions and Updates

This is a discussion on Australian Army Discussions and Updates within the Army & Security Forces forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Anyone know of any exercises around SEQ at the moment involving the Tiger's ? Saw one today buzzing Byron Bay, ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 15 votes, 3.67 average.
Old January 17th, 2013   #3211
Defense Professional / Analyst
Major
aussienscale's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northern Rivers, NSW
Posts: 963
Threads:
Anyone know of any exercises around SEQ at the moment involving the Tiger's ? Saw one today buzzing Byron Bay, was pretty low too

Cheers
aussienscale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 18th, 2013   #3212
Defense Professional / Analyst
Lieutenant General
Abraham Gubler's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,849
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aussienscale View Post
Anyone know of any exercises around SEQ at the moment involving the Tiger's ? Saw one today buzzing Byron Bay, was pretty low too

Cheers
That was probably the same Tiger that did 4-5 low circles (<500 feet) over the top of Burleigh Heads today at 1130. I enjoyed it, I'm sure the aircrew enjoyed it. I don't know if it served any training purpose but.
Abraham Gubler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 18th, 2013   #3213
Defense Professional / Analyst
Major
aussienscale's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northern Rivers, NSW
Posts: 963
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abraham Gubler View Post
That was probably the same Tiger that did 4-5 low circles (<500 feet) over the top of Burleigh Heads today at 1130. I enjoyed it, I'm sure the aircrew enjoyed it. I don't know if it served any training purpose but.
Yep, was good to see, probably did not serve a purpose, but he had several thousand people stopped in their tracks in Byron when he came through

It was nice to see something other than the SH's down at Evans Head, or the C-17's around Ballina Airport

Cheers
aussienscale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 21st, 2013   #3214
Senior Member
Colonel
No Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,588
Threads:
Apologies for the off-topic question. Back in the early or mid-1990's a small convoy of lorries carrying members of the Butterworth Rifle Company were involved in a collision with a civllian vehicle, in Malaysia, and at least a couple of Australians were killed.
Does anyone recall the exact year this accident took place, thank you.
STURM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22nd, 2013   #3215
Defense Professional / Analyst
Captain
No Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The land of Oz
Posts: 810
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by STURM View Post
Apologies for the off-topic question. Back in the early or mid-1990's a small convoy of lorries carrying members of the Butterworth Rifle Company were involved in a collision with a civllian vehicle, in Malaysia, and at least a couple of Australians were killed.
Does anyone recall the exact year this accident took place, thank you.
Sadly i think that involved one of the NCO's I worked with at 6RAR - Cpl Mal Rutherford. Top bloke and an excellent JNCO. We left our Butterworth rotation when I was at 6 in Jan '90 iirc. We had 2 of the Hino 4x4 trucks used as troop carriers go into ditches evading the dodgy malay drivers thankfully with no injuries or significant damage in the 3 months we were there. It would have occurred the next time 6RAR did the Butterworth rotation I'd guess 91-92? Can't find dates - anyone got better google-fu?
Marc 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22nd, 2013   #3216
Defense Professional / Analyst
Captain
old faithful's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Darwin Australia
Posts: 713
Threads:
We (3RAR) relieved 6RAR in 92, there was no talk at all of that incident, don't think it was that year.
Saw a couple of bad road accidents though, one near Ipoh that I remember in great detail, very sad.
I hate those Hino trucks.
old faithful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22nd, 2013   #3217
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 13,235
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by old faithful View Post
We (3RAR) relieved 6RAR in 92, there was no talk at all of that incident, don't think it was that year.
Saw a couple of bad road accidents though, one near Ipoh that I remember in great detail, very sad.
I hate those Hino trucks.
I was in Malaysia 1985.

I hated driving the road to Johore. The tuk-tuk drivers used to try and overtake logging trucks going up the hills

They were mad.....

you'd see an accident every trip and usually all within 3km of each other
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23rd, 2013   #3218
Senior Member
Colonel
No Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,588
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by old faithful View Post
Saw a couple of bad road accidents though, one near Ipoh that I remember in great detail, very sad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gf0012-aust View Post
They were mad.....

you'd see an accident every trip and usually all within 3km of each other
Unfortunately, Malaysian driving skills - in general - over the years have not improved and in fact have gotten worse. Many drivers lack even basic driving skills and seem totally oblivous to the fact that there are others on the road. The only other place I've seen with equally bad and mad drivers was Greece but then at least the ones I saw actually knew how to drive ....
STURM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23rd, 2013   #3219
Just Hatched
Private
Para 3's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North West Australia
Posts: 11
Threads:
RCB Butterworth

3RAR replaced 5/7RAR in 1985. A LCPL from 5/7 was killed two weeks before that rotation ended in a truck v truck accident. It made for a sad handover.
Para 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 24th, 2013   #3220
Junior Member
Private First Class
No Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 98
Threads:
Another question, and sorry to interrupt the current chat.

On defencejobs I've been looking into the 'Fire Fighter/Emergency Responder', I also see the RAAF have a similar position. In regards to the Army, is anyone able to provide more insight or know anybody who is/or has been in this role?
rand0m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 24th, 2013   #3221
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 14
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rand0m View Post
Another question, and sorry to interrupt the current chat.

On defencejobs I've been looking into the 'Fire Fighter/Emergency Responder', I also see the RAAF have a similar position. In regards to the Army, is anyone able to provide more insight or know anybody who is/or has been in this role?
Army Aviation elements use soldiers from the Incident Response Regiment (although their location may have changed as of Dec 12) when scrub. All RAE badged.

On barracks it's usually 000 or RAAF support depending where the unit is (do RAAF support 7 RAR if needed?).
Focus-AS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 24th, 2013   #3222
Defense Professional / Analyst
Chief Warrant Officer
No Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 420
Threads:
Most large Army bases have Army firefighters. Don't know what unit they belong to but they're all RAE. From what I understand its the most boring job in the Army. Nothing ever happens.
Raven22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 24th, 2013   #3223
Defense Professional / Analyst
Lieutenant General
Abraham Gubler's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,849
Threads:
Historically the need for Army fire-fighters came from the establishment of a stand-alone Army aviation capability. So air force things needed to be replicated like airfield crash response and police with dog patrols. But of course air traffic control being an officer billet the RAAF kept that! In order to make the capability sustainable it was expanded to squadron sized and given the job of nuclear, chemical and biological cleanup. Which apparently happens less often than Army aircraft crashing at Oakey. They could deploy to training areas in support of live fires and put out secondary bushfires and be useful but nooooo…. Since the IRR has focused on the war role of providing CIED capability to SOF apparently they’ve been kicked out of this regiment as it became the SOER. Who knows where they are now?
Abraham Gubler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 26th, 2013   #3224
Defense Enthusiast
Major
t68's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: southern highlands NSW
Posts: 880
Threads:
Not really sure on what section to put this, Army or Airforce.

I was reading elsewhere that AAAvn is have a hard time with pilot numbers with experience members are separating in numbers which is having an impact on platform availability (no direct source on this)

It was brought up (elsewhere) that Army Aviation should revert back to the RAAF control where in times gone buy that they would have dual qualified personnel able to make up numbers, which they can cover in times of a shortfall till more suitable qualified members up to speed., the logic sounded fine to me but having no experience in this area was not sure of the case.

It was also stated by freeing Army from its obligations from Aviation it can concentrate on more pressing issues like SPG, but the way I see it no matter who controls the assets the funding will follow. We are seeing a more Joint force (purple force) with the LHD with personnel from all three services on board is it time to hand back the helicopters from Army and if that’s the case should the RAN follow suit?

Some are suggesting because of our size and limitations, that the ADF cannot and should not have 3 separate Airforce, should the RAAF do what it does best and control aviation assets, after all the primary job of the Airforce is to support the Army/Navy winning the land/sea battle weather it’s by helicopter or fast jet. But on the other hand helicopters are a fundamental part of Army Orbat for Air Assault and land maneuver, should it be Army supporting Army or Airforce supporting Army/Navy?
t68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 26th, 2013   #3225
Defense Professional / Analyst
Chief Warrant Officer
No Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 420
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by t68 View Post
Not really sure on what section to put this, Army or Airforce.

I was reading elsewhere that AAAvn is have a hard time with pilot numbers with experience members are separating in numbers which is having an impact on platform availability (no direct source on this)

It was brought up (elsewhere) that Army Aviation should revert back to the RAAF control where in times gone buy that they would have dual qualified personnel able to make up numbers, which they can cover in times of a shortfall till more suitable qualified members up to speed., the logic sounded fine to me but having no experience in this area was not sure of the case.

It was also stated by freeing Army from its obligations from Aviation it can concentrate on more pressing issues like SPG, but the way I see it no matter who controls the assets the funding will follow. We are seeing a more Joint force (purple force) with the LHD with personnel from all three services on board is it time to hand back the helicopters from Army and if that’s the case should the RAN follow suit?

Some are suggesting because of our size and limitations, that the ADF cannot and should not have 3 separate Airforce, should the RAAF do what it does best and control aviation assets, after all the primary job of the Airforce is to support the Army/Navy winning the land/sea battle weather it’s by helicopter or fast jet. But on the other hand helicopters are a fundamental part of Army Orbat for Air Assault and land maneuver, should it be Army supporting Army or Airforce supporting Army/Navy?
At the moment Army has no real problem with pilot numbers - there are currently more pilots than airframes to fly. Which is really more of an indictment on platform choice than any real success in generating pilots. Recruitment for pilots has actually been slown down.
Raven22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
adf, army, australia

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 AM.