SABRE
September 1st, 2005, 01:46 PM
Ukraine Admits It Sold Cruise Missiles to Iran, China
AFP
Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 14:00
Ukraine’s prosecutor general’s office on March 18 confirmed reports that Kiev had sold nuclear-capable cruise missiles to both Iran and China, but stressed that the deals were illegal and under criminal investigation.
“This is not about exports of missiles but rather illegal sales which are being investigated by the SBU (security service) which has opened a criminal investigation of the director of the company Ukrspetsexport,” the prosecutor’s office said in a statement.
Svyatoslav Piskun, Ukraine’s prosecutor general, earlier told the respected, London-based Financial Times daily that 18 Soviet-era X-55 cruise missiles were exported in 2001 — 12 to Iran and six to China.
Piskun was also quoted as saying that the missiles were not exported with the nuclear warheads that they were designed to carry.
Ukraine Foreign Minister Boris Tarasyuk said that the country’s new leadership, which assumed power during late last year, was not responsible for the sales.
“We can only condemn the non-democratic actions that were carried out by the previous authorities,” he said, while on a visit to neighboring Belarus.
“The results of (our) investigation point to a criminal group that was involved in unlawful sales of arms,” he said. Tarasyuk said the group included citizens of several countries.
The X-55, an air-launched missile also known as the Kh-55 and AS-15 and first introduced in 1976, has a range of 3,500 kilometers (2,175 miles), which would give China — or North Korea, if it obtained the missile — easy access to Japan, while Iran could hit its main regional foe, Israel.
Both Japan and the United States were reportedly worried about what appeared to be a significant leak of military technology.
Last month, the Ukrainian government opened a criminal inquiry, at the request of Japan, into the illegal sale of 18 missiles by the Ukrspetsexport arms group to unspecified states via Russia.
The Ukrainian confirmation of missiles sales to Iran comes amid a tense diplomatic debate over Tehran’s alleged quest for nuclear weaponry.
Reports about the missile sales going to Iran emerged earlier this month.
However, the March 18 statement was the first acknowledged by the Kiev government, and is likely to heighten suspicions about Tehran’s nuclear program.
The Islamic republic insists its nuclear program is aimed at peaceful civilian use but Washington claims it is designed to produce nuclear arms.
Ukraine had a massive weapons arsenal after the fall of the Soviet Union, but it returned its nuclear warheads to Russia or destroyed them under a US-funded disarmament program.
Its remaining weaponry is, however, a source of major concern in the West, fueled by several high-profile cases of arms trafficking including radar technology to Saddam Hussein’s now ousted regime in Iraq.
Two anti-aircraft missiles and a launch system were reported stolen last month from a Ukrainian naval base in the Crimean peninsula, while Turkey reported seizing a Ukrainian radio-controlled missile and missile heads en route to Egypt last June.
Although the X-55 is designed to carry a nuclear warhead, it can also be loaded with conventional weaponry and would not be Iran’s ideal nuclear missile, Doug Richardson, editor of Jane’s Missiles and Rockets magazine, said.
Richardson told Agence France-Presse the Tehran regime’s own Shahab ballistic missile was better suited since it was faster than a cruise missile.
“If they’re going to nuclearize a weapon, they’re much more likely to do so with one of their ballistic missiles. A ballistic missile, simply because of its sheer speed, is more difficult to defend against than a cruise missile,” he said, calling the Shahab “almost unstoppable.”
A cruise missile, on the other hand, travels at subsonic speed comparable to that of an airplane, he added.
However, John Eldridge, editor of Jane’s Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defence, told Agence France-Presse the report was a fresh sign that Iran was seeking “to beef up its offensive capability in the region.”
Source: DefenceTalk News
Link: http://www.defencetalk.com/news/publish/article_002253.php
AFP
Sat, 19 Mar 2005, 14:00
Ukraine’s prosecutor general’s office on March 18 confirmed reports that Kiev had sold nuclear-capable cruise missiles to both Iran and China, but stressed that the deals were illegal and under criminal investigation.
“This is not about exports of missiles but rather illegal sales which are being investigated by the SBU (security service) which has opened a criminal investigation of the director of the company Ukrspetsexport,” the prosecutor’s office said in a statement.
Svyatoslav Piskun, Ukraine’s prosecutor general, earlier told the respected, London-based Financial Times daily that 18 Soviet-era X-55 cruise missiles were exported in 2001 — 12 to Iran and six to China.
Piskun was also quoted as saying that the missiles were not exported with the nuclear warheads that they were designed to carry.
Ukraine Foreign Minister Boris Tarasyuk said that the country’s new leadership, which assumed power during late last year, was not responsible for the sales.
“We can only condemn the non-democratic actions that were carried out by the previous authorities,” he said, while on a visit to neighboring Belarus.
“The results of (our) investigation point to a criminal group that was involved in unlawful sales of arms,” he said. Tarasyuk said the group included citizens of several countries.
The X-55, an air-launched missile also known as the Kh-55 and AS-15 and first introduced in 1976, has a range of 3,500 kilometers (2,175 miles), which would give China — or North Korea, if it obtained the missile — easy access to Japan, while Iran could hit its main regional foe, Israel.
Both Japan and the United States were reportedly worried about what appeared to be a significant leak of military technology.
Last month, the Ukrainian government opened a criminal inquiry, at the request of Japan, into the illegal sale of 18 missiles by the Ukrspetsexport arms group to unspecified states via Russia.
The Ukrainian confirmation of missiles sales to Iran comes amid a tense diplomatic debate over Tehran’s alleged quest for nuclear weaponry.
Reports about the missile sales going to Iran emerged earlier this month.
However, the March 18 statement was the first acknowledged by the Kiev government, and is likely to heighten suspicions about Tehran’s nuclear program.
The Islamic republic insists its nuclear program is aimed at peaceful civilian use but Washington claims it is designed to produce nuclear arms.
Ukraine had a massive weapons arsenal after the fall of the Soviet Union, but it returned its nuclear warheads to Russia or destroyed them under a US-funded disarmament program.
Its remaining weaponry is, however, a source of major concern in the West, fueled by several high-profile cases of arms trafficking including radar technology to Saddam Hussein’s now ousted regime in Iraq.
Two anti-aircraft missiles and a launch system were reported stolen last month from a Ukrainian naval base in the Crimean peninsula, while Turkey reported seizing a Ukrainian radio-controlled missile and missile heads en route to Egypt last June.
Although the X-55 is designed to carry a nuclear warhead, it can also be loaded with conventional weaponry and would not be Iran’s ideal nuclear missile, Doug Richardson, editor of Jane’s Missiles and Rockets magazine, said.
Richardson told Agence France-Presse the Tehran regime’s own Shahab ballistic missile was better suited since it was faster than a cruise missile.
“If they’re going to nuclearize a weapon, they’re much more likely to do so with one of their ballistic missiles. A ballistic missile, simply because of its sheer speed, is more difficult to defend against than a cruise missile,” he said, calling the Shahab “almost unstoppable.”
A cruise missile, on the other hand, travels at subsonic speed comparable to that of an airplane, he added.
However, John Eldridge, editor of Jane’s Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defence, told Agence France-Presse the report was a fresh sign that Iran was seeking “to beef up its offensive capability in the region.”
Source: DefenceTalk News
Link: http://www.defencetalk.com/news/publish/article_002253.php