View Full Version : Top 10 Navies
Panzer
February 20th, 2004, 11:08 AM
We have airforce rankings going on, so how about navies?
Please post your reasons for rankings.
USA will definately be first. So who after USA??
gf0012-aust
February 20th, 2004, 11:31 AM
The USN Reserve fleet is actually the second largest in the world
If its total naval vessels (and not just combatants)
The USN Lift (merchant fleet) is the third largest
and the USN Reserve Lift is the fourth largest
It might pay to restrict this to combatant vessels only.
So:
USN 1st
USN Reserve. 2nd
UK 3rd
Japan 4th
France 5th
Panzer
February 20th, 2004, 11:37 AM
It might pay to restrict this to combatant vessels only.
Ok guys combatant vessels only.
Also what about China??
India??
big_evil
February 20th, 2004, 11:48 AM
I have no freakin idea abt the navies...all I know is that US, Uk, Russia, France, China have the most powerful ones.... anyone wants to add details to that?
Panzer
February 20th, 2004, 11:50 AM
I have no freakin idea abt the navies...all I know is that US, Uk, Russia, France, China have the most powerful ones.... anyone wants to add details to that?
I would add Japan to that list but i am not too sure about Russia.
gf0012-aust
February 20th, 2004, 11:54 AM
It might pay to restrict this to combatant vessels only.
Ok guys combatant vessels only.
Also what about China??
India??
you need to consider the capability of those vessels,
eg Russian still nominally has a large fleet, except that up to 2/3rds of it is sitting in one of the 12 ports in the north west rusting away - absolutely useless - but their penant numbers are still active.
China - to all intents and purposes has a Littoral Fleet, and a significant number of her frigate sized vessels are considered to be obsolete - in fact Japans Navy is more than capable of destroying if not containing the chinese navy - as it currently stands.
I'd argue that at a surface combatant level, India has a more powerful fleet than China, but at the submarine level, I would say that China is more powerful.
See how difficult this is? ;)
If you change the rules and then measure it by an issue of throw weight, then its
USA
Russia
UK (as they have MIRVS on their Tridents)
France
China
Israel (as they have developed nukes to be capped onto their sub launched cruise missiles)
India doesn't have any boomers, and the Yakhont/Brahmos is not nuke capable (yet)
big_evil
February 20th, 2004, 12:03 PM
people here are forgetting how fast China is upgrading and modernizing its forces... including the army, airforce, and the NAVY!! they're phasing out old stuff and inducting newer stuff... India is only good with surface combatants... submarine wise...even Pakistan is better than india... and leave the indian aircraft carrier away cuz its worthless...dunno y the indianz bought it in the first place.... russia....yess! they MAJORLY need to open their eyes and see the rusting stuff in their docks... and yeah I forgot to mention Japan before...its navy is pretty awesome!
gf0012-aust
February 20th, 2004, 12:12 PM
people here are forgetting how fast China is upgrading and modernizing its forces... including the army, airforce, and the NAVY!! they're phasing out old stuff and inducting newer stuff... India is only good with surface combatants... submarine wise...even Pakistan is better than india... and leave the indian aircraft carrier away cuz its worthless...dunno y the indianz bought it in the first place.... russia....yess! they MAJORLY need to open their eyes and see the rusting stuff in their docks... and yeah I forgot to mention Japan before...its navy is pretty awesome!
My comments are based on knowing what China is in the process of upgrading and replacing - they still do not have a surface fleet that could depart home waters and effectively prosecute an effective engagement against Japan or India (for example)
New platforms require new training, they require substantial effort into re-integrating into the existing fleet. China does not have any surface force projection, india OTOH does.
The total number of vessels means nothing, total tonnage means little
capability
throw weight
force projection
autonomous prosecution
training
logistics support
denial capability
surge ability
tempo consistency
integration into other national assets
competency of the officer corp
doctrinal logic
all of the above define what is a capable navy (and army, airforce)
big_evil
February 20th, 2004, 12:20 PM
I dont see a reason why China in the coming yrs wud not undertake every effort to entirely modernize all its forces no matter what amount of fundin and training required... it has the perfect economy and internal strength and is bound to challenge the US by ....lets say 2060 or I wana be too optimistic then 2030... no other military force wud be near to China's by then.... whether army, airforce, navy or nuclear...
Red aRRow
February 20th, 2004, 12:30 PM
no other military force wud be near to China's by then.... whether army, airforce, navy or nuclear...
Oh come on...U.S.A and Russia are still there dude. It's not like they're all going to leave the planet anytime soon. :roll
big_evil
February 20th, 2004, 12:34 PM
Russia's fleet is rusting away and USA has too many DADDY obligations all around the world...I dont think US can at once gather up all its forces at one point if by 2050 China decides to attack with full might at one place...lets say Taiwan... lol think rationally dude!
Red aRRow
February 20th, 2004, 12:43 PM
Well speculation is just that...speculation. We will never know until it really is 2050.
Panzer
February 20th, 2004, 12:52 PM
Well 2050 is a long way away
Top 10 navies right now??
big_evil
February 20th, 2004, 01:02 PM
lol...look for that above! hahahha :smokingc:
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.