This is a discussion on USMC expanding Harrier fleet within the Air Force & Aviation forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; With the USMC about to get their hands on the ex RN/RAF harrier fleet, what do they need to do ...
With the USMC about to get their hands on the ex RN/RAF harrier fleet, what do they need to do to make them compatible with current USMC fleet of AV-8B Harrier aircraft II.
Reading between the UK and US versions of the aircraft there is a subtle difference’s between the aircraft not only in the avionics, weapons but also different wing elevated cockpit and redesigned fuselage. With the US getting all of the UK harriers 72 in total, from early Sea Harriers to the later version of Harrier II GR5, 7, 9.I would imagine that minimal amount of work in the avionics for a majority of the fleet will suffice to keep whole Squadron of the same type together to replace F/A-18D on mass and for easier integration for the supply chain.
How do people see the US managing its enlarged mixed fleet of Harriers in the future?
With the USMC about to get their hands on the ex RN/RAF harrier fleet, what do they need to do to make them compatible with current USMC fleet of AV-8B Harrier aircraft II.
Reading between the UK and US versions of the aircraft there is a subtle difference’s between the aircraft not only in the avionics, weapons but also different wing elevated cockpit and redesigned fuselage. With the US getting all of the UK harriers 72 in total, from early Sea Harriers to the later version of Harrier II GR5, 7, 9.I would imagine that minimal amount of work in the avionics for a majority of the fleet will suffice to keep whole Squadron of the same type together to replace F/A-18D on mass and for easier integration for the supply chain.
How do people see the US managing its enlarged mixed fleet of Harriers in the future?
With the US getting all of the UK harriers 72 in total, from early Sea Harriers to the later version of Harrier II GR5, 7, 9.
The other reports I've read say that the USMC is getting GR9s, GR9As, & T12. I'm not sure if there are any GR5s or GR7s left. I thought they'd all either been upgraded to GR9 or disposed of, not mothballed.
Sea Harriers would be of no use at all. None of the parts would fit. Different airframe, different engine. AFAIK, the only ones left are used as instructional airframes, not mothballed.
Think of the sale as a windfall for the British. They got 2.5 million each for old jets they were discarding. Thirty years ago the Harriers may have made wonderful interceptors, but lately they were used mostly for strike missions. They are no match to modern fighters in the interceptor role being too slow and outranged by fighters with longer range air to air missiles everywhere.
While the Harriers did excellent work during the Falklands, if the Argies had had hundreds of Exocets instead of one handful, one wonders whether the British would have won that battle. Not to mention a newer, faster, and better jet than a Mirage III or Skyhawk.
Considering the price of new modern fighters, the Typhoon and Lightning II, its no wonder the British are keen to unload the soon to be obsolescent Harriers. While I am not certain, I understand the British Harriers were not used during the UN LIbya air campaign.
Recently the British bought/ordered an EMALS catapult for the second QE carrier HMS Prince of Wales. It will be the second carrier with EMALS after the Gerald R. Ford. Hopefully the British buy a second EMALS to install on HMS Queen Elizabeth too soon.
EMALS has done wonderfully in the tests so far with a number of naval aircraft, from the Hawkeye, Greyhound, Super Hornet, Hornet, Prowler, and with naval versions of the Lightning II. The US Navy anticipates significantly better sortie rates with EMALS over the present steam catapults.
