Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Air Force & Aviation
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Miramar_14_MV-22_1965a.JPG

Miramar_14_MV-22_0358a.JPG

Miramar_14_GR4_1646a.JPG

Miramar_14_LF_0221a.JPG
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





Qaher 313 New Iranian Fighter Jet

This is a discussion on Qaher 313 New Iranian Fighter Jet within the Air Force & Aviation forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Originally Posted by SpudmanWP 7. The airspeed dial (upper left of console) redlines at 250-275 knots ... We've seen 1st ...


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old February 2nd, 2013   #46
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 22
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpudmanWP View Post

7. The airspeed dial (upper left of console) redlines at 250-275 knots

... We've seen 1st hand what a cockpit, landing gear, the skin, etc actualy look like and feel like.
275 knots = 510 km/h

So, it appears that the Iranian F-313 flights with no more that 510 km/h. At this speed you do not need more cockpit and landing gear technology than a plane from 1935.

Do not compare some large supersonic fighter jets, you may have seen, with F-313.
simplex is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2013   #47
Defense Enthusiast
Lieutenant
SpudmanWP's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United Socialist Cities of California
Posts: 585
Threads:
At least planes from 1935 had a canopy that you could lock closed and switches that could actually be reached.

But what the heck, I'll give you that they made their own plane from 1935 tech
SpudmanWP is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2013   #48
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 14,787
Threads:
I have come out of reading this post dumber for the experience....

Simplex, henaselakesan if you're going to try and have a technical argument with people then you picked the wrong people to challenge, all of the posters trying to be reasonable and discuss actual technical issues are long term members who have a significant degree of credibility - it would be wiser for you to pause and understand rather than doing the Don Quixote

its apparent that both of you understand little about LO/VLO aircraft constructs/conops, let alone the technical issues surrounding aircraft design into a modern force construct.

Thread closed for discussion by Mod team, but I wouldn't bank on it getting re-opened
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
http://cofda.wordpress.com/
gf0012-aust is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05 PM.