Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Air Force & Aviation
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

-77689755705287080691.jpg

-7768975570528708069.jpg

Ural_Taifun_V-day_parade_Yekaterinburg.jpg

Kamaz_Taifun_at_trials.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





Iran claims to have shot down US drone

This is a discussion on Iran claims to have shot down US drone within the Air Force & Aviation forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Originally Posted by LeGrig UAV looks in good shape. In case it looses thrust (empty fuel), I do not think ...


View Poll Results: How was this UAV lost on its mission?
Deliberate acquisition (Iranians managed to exploit onboard systems weaknesses) 6 21.43%
Opportunity acquisition (UAV had onboard systems failure and the Iranians ran a snatch) 20 71.43%
What missing UAV? 2 7.14%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 1.00 average.
Old January 3rd, 2012   #106
Defense Enthusiast
Master Sergeant
RobWilliams's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 362
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeGrig View Post
UAV looks in good shape. In case it looses thrust (empty fuel), I do not think it will glide so smooth; so that the landing was (self)controlled, in this case. It may be also the reason for the Iranians not displaying the formerly captured UAVs (if any) - they were in too poor condition as being shut down.
True it may not have been a perfect landing, but notice all public images of it in Iranian hands have the base covered up completely. This suggests the base had been utterly damaged, i suspect this was the case because a complete UAV in perfect order suggests 'Of course, we hacked it and landed it perfectly', however with damage it shows either 2 things
  • That it crashed due to internal errors
  • or that whoever controlled it after it was 'hacked' didn't do a particularly good job

It just makes me sceptical, you can't see any of the bottom of the UAV in the slightest. True it wouldn't be a perfect landing but i wouldnt be suprised if it had an effect like a glider and did a rudementary 'belly landing' in the desert (which would again substantiate a ruined undercarriage)
RobWilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2012   #107
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 12,282
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobWilliams View Post
True, but a DT article i posted earlier says that if communication with the controller fails then the drone is programmed to return to base.
there are a number of preprogrammed solutions in UAV's

eg

return to last waypoint

hold at point and commence ever increasing circles in an attempt to connect

circle and start to gradually lose altitude (managed descent)

default to nearest safe harbour (ie friendly recovery loc

then there is the issue of whether the entire mission is waypoint programmed with human observors who only get involved if manual intervention required, or whether they are activeky ground managed.

if a UAV is going off the reservation, then thats when manned intervention would kick in - but it may well already be comms lost and is an airborne orphan
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2012   #108
Defense Enthusiast
Sergeant
NICO's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: AZ, USA
Posts: 204
Threads:
F-22 Technology On UAV That Crashed In Iran | AVIATION WEEK

I know some people don't like Bill for his position on J SF but as far as I'm concerned, he knows a lot more people and contacts in the Pentagon than myself or probably most of the people on DT, so I listen to what he has to say.

Read the new article just published by ARES and Bill, from what US officials are saying, there wasn't all that much lost. I believe the US officials more than Iranian officials anyways. Look at the missile Iran just launched:so called super technology and crap, it's a modified SA-2, you really think it could compare to a Patriot/S300 or HQ10?

From what US official is saying, considering how many Reapers/Predators have been lost, I guess the US assumes that all that technology is in the hands of Russia or China already, so how much would they really gain by looking at RQ?

IMHO, RQ was just a slightly more LO and reconfigurable Predator. Interesting to note that if RQ did pancake on landing, all the bottom with the "good" stuff hanging was more than likely shredded to pieces...If it is true the landing gear comes from a trainer, I am pretty sure the engine is some COTS jet engine from a Cessna or Lear...

Not sure Iran got a whole lot out of this as some people think....
NICO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5th, 2012   #109
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 21
Threads:
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by NICO View Post
F-22 Technology On UAV That Crashed In Iran | AVIATION WEEK
Not sure Iran got a whole lot out of this as some people think....
For sure it's a scrap - technologically. That's the fate of any UAV (up to now)...
The fact it's CIA operated makes it valuable. Intelligence data may be very interesting. Hope there is no recorded data on board... which I think is the case, after loosing 50+ such vehicles.
LeGrig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23rd, 2012   #110
Defense Enthusiast
Sergeant
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 257
Threads:
It seems the USAF now knows the circumstances surrounding the loss of the drone and it had nothing to do with Iran.

RQ-170 Sentinel spy drone still in use by U.S. Air Force despite Iran crash, capture | News | National Post

U.S. knows what caused stealth drone crash, and it wasn’t Iran: Air Force Chief

Reuters Jan 13, 2012 – 12:24 PM ET

By Andrea Shalal-Esa

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Air Force has established what caused the crash of one of its unmanned spy drones over Iran late last year and continues to use that type of drone, Air Force Chief of Staff General Norton Schwartz said...

U.S. officials reject Iran’s claim that it brought down the stealthy RQ-170 Sentinel built by Lockheed Martin Corp, but remain tight-lipped about what caused the crash.
colay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 PM.