Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Air Force & Aviation
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Miramar_14_F-35B_2198a.JPG

Miramar_14_F-35B_2198a.JPG

IMG_7004-1.JPG

IMG_7010-1.JPG
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





F-35 - International Participation

This is a discussion on F-35 - International Participation within the Air Force & Aviation forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Here's a nice Sky News article + video about the UK F-35's. Philip Hammond Unsure About F-35 Order The part ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old May 4th, 2013   #46
Moderator
Major General
RobWilliams's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,311
Threads:
Here's a nice Sky News article + video about the UK F-35's.

Philip Hammond Unsure About F-35 Order

The part most relevant to this thread is the UK's order, unsurprisingly it talks about how the UK might not buy all 138, but the more interesting part is the variants.

Quote:
Well our first buy is gonna be 48 aircraft, that'll deliver us the carrier fleet we'll need, and then later on in the life of the aircraft when we're looking to replace our Typhoons we will buy further aircraft but we haven't decided how many at this stage
IMO that sort of indication suggests that the idea of an A/B split fleet is on the cards, if the first 48 are B's for the carriers and the rest are more aimed at *replacing* (or more likely supplementing in the middle term) Typhoon which would definitely indicate the A.

EDIT: Link from FlightGlobal announcing that initial funding for long lead items for the first 2 Israeli F35A's has been recieved for LRIP 8

Lockheed receives long-lead funding for first Israeli F-35s

Gives a nice list of all the variants due to be produced in LRIP 8
  • 19 F35A - USAF
  • 6 F35B - USMC
  • 4 F35C - USN
  • 4 F35B - UK
  • 4 F35A - Japan
  • 4 F35A - Italy
  • 2 F35A - Norway
  • 2 F35A - Israel

Although funding for the 4 Italian A's has yet to be committed.

Last edited by RobWilliams; May 4th, 2013 at 08:27 AM.
RobWilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2013   #47
Super Moderator
Lieutenant General
OPSSG's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,849
Threads:
8 May 2013 - Turkey's Undersecretariat for Defense Industries (SSM) signed an agreement with Lockheed Martin to make two additional purchases from the F-35 Lightning II family of aircraft, to be delivered by 2016 (or LRIP Lot 8) at the International Defence Industry Fair in Istanbul.

According to Hurriyet Daily News, O’Bryan stated that “Turkey’s 100-plane order, which will be worth less than $12 billion, will be delivered between 2017 and 2025. But, Turkey will also manufacture the F-35. To date, Turkey has obtained a contract worth $300 million from the F-35 program.
________________
“Terrorism is the tactic of demanding the impossible, and demanding it at gunpoint.”
Christopher Hitchens

Last edited by OPSSG; May 11th, 2013 at 10:10 AM.
OPSSG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13th, 2013   #48
Defense Enthusiast
Captain
the road runner's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 768
Threads:
A good video from the perspective of Team Canada and the benefits and international program brings to Canadian. $450 million worth of contracts already won by Canadian industry has to be a big positive for the Aeronautical industry of Canada.

Canadians Talk About Building the F-35 - YouTube
the road runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2013   #49
Moderator
Major General
RobWilliams's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,311
Threads:
The UK's third F-35B (BK-3) has arrived at Eglin AFB

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/t...the-uk-arrives

Quote:
The aircraft will be used for pilot and maintainer training for the UK team currently based in the USA. At Eglin, pilots from the Royal Navy and RAF and ground crew are working alongside their US Marine Corps colleagues learning all they can about maintaining the aircraft and how to fly the platforms to get the best out of them.
I vaguely recall reading that the trio will fly to Edwards AFB at a later date, but i'm not 100% sure.

Still, good progress with hopefully an order of 14 planes to be made by the end of the year. There was a bit of chatter about a newspaper reporting a buy of 18, but that's probably nonsense.
RobWilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 4th, 2013   #50
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2
Threads:
Just a quick update on the Italian partnership to the program.
Last week a motion passed at the Lower House which stated that the Parliament will have to approve any further stage of F-35 purchase, and that the program will be under review for 6 months.
If you want further details, see the Cenciotti's blog, I am unable to post links, but the related post is easily searchable.

Yesterday, the Supreme Defense Council, an organism who has as chairman the President of the Italian Republic, clarified that such motion was void, since an approval of a law in the 2012 which disciplined the military acquisition programs for Italy.
The SDC stated that currently, since the Parliament already approved the purchase in 2009, only the Government (which favors the buy) could further cut or cancel what is now part of the ordinary budget of the Defense.
The Parliament would have to make a new law amending the previous one in order to stop the program, or will have to deny the annual general budget at the end of the year – which would most probably means the fall of the current Government.

The implications are that, in spite of a majority at the lower house who adverse the purchase, most probably they will not risk to legislate against the buy, which also would mean, in case of approval of such new law, the resignation of the current coalition government, which instead is in favor of the purchase.

I have no comment on the new, anyway this means that the program in Italy will most probably follow the planned course, at least as long as the current government remains in charge.
Glendora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2013   #51
Moderator
Major General
RobWilliams's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,311
Threads:
Italy has opened it's F-35 assembly line and has begun assembling activities on its first F35A.

Italy opens F-35 assembly line, as political opposition grows

Quote:
The new, €800 million ($1 billion) final assembly and check-out (FACO) facility inside Cameri air base, near Milan "was established in a compressed period and is running on schedule and budget," General Chief Inspector Domenico Esposito, head of Aeronautics Armament Procurement, said in a recent interview released by the Italian defence ministry.

...

Italy currently plans to acquire 60 conventional take-off and landing (CTOL) F-35As and 15 short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) F-35Bs for its air force, plus 15 more of the latter for the navy to employ from its Cavour aircraft carrier.

...

"With the aircraft assembly reaching its regime, the FACO will gradually evolve into a MRO&U facility for the estimated potential 600 F-35s operating in the same region and other customers," Esposito says. "We already signed an agreement with the Netherlands for assembling their F-35s, while they will support our aircraft's [Pratt & Whitney F135] engines. A similar agreement in the aircraft logistic support area has been signed with Norwegian authorities for their planned F-35 acquisition."
Seems a pretty solid setup for a centralised hub for European F-35 activities, but an interesting point is that their plan isn't for a split of A for the Air Force and B for the Navy, but the Air Force is getting hold of the majority of the B's with 15 going to the Navy for operations on Cavour.

In regards to current funding for the JSF, Italy has the following
  • 3 F35A in LRIP 6
  • 3 F35A in LRIP 7
  • initial funding for 4 in LRIP 8
  • 'believed to have' advanced funding for 3 F35A + 1 F35B (Navy) for LRIP 9

Above numbers from the linked article.
RobWilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2013   #52
Defense Enthusiast
Lieutenant
SpudmanWP's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United Socialist Cities of California
Posts: 585
Threads:
Here is the announcement of the LRIP 9 Funding:

Pentagon Contract Announcement

Quote:
Lockheed Martin Corp., Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., Fort Worth, Texas, is being awarded a $70,358,000 modification to a previously awarded advance acquisition contract (N00019-13-C-0008) to provide long lead-time parts, material and components required for the delivery of seven Conventional Take Off and Landing F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter aircraft and one Short Take-Off Vertical Landing F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter aircraft for the government of Italy.

Work will be performed in Fort Worth, Texas, and is expected to be completed in February 2014.

International Partner contract funds in the amount of $70,358,000 are being obligated on this award, none of which will expire at the end of the current fiscal year.

The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Md., is the contracting authority.
It seems to have mixed LRIP8 & LRIP9 long lead funding together as N00019-13-C-0008 is the contract for LRIP8

I will have to do some digging to get the details.
SpudmanWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2013   #53
Moderator
Major General
RobWilliams's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,311
Threads:
It definitely looks like it, the quoted numbers there are the combination of LRIP 8 & 9 orders.

From Defense News

Quote:
The plane now being assembled will be delivered in the fourth quarter of 2015 after software and flight testing begins in the summer of 2014, while the second aircraft will be delivered in the first quarter of 2016. The first short-takeoff, vertical-landing F-35B jet is the 14th aircraft due to be delivered — the last jet in LRIP-9, with a delivery date in the fourth quarter of 2017.
Amid Local Opposition, Italy Begins F-35 Assembly | Defense News | defensenews.com
RobWilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20th, 2013   #54
Super Moderator
Lieutenant General
OPSSG's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,849
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWG
Defense Writers Group: A Project of the Center for Media & Security.
Interview with General Herbert J. “Hawk” Carlisle Commander, Pacific Air Forces 29 July 2013

DWG: ...you also mentioned Singapore. We reported and heard that they are, they’re part of the F-35 program already, but that there was some movement to... Can you give us an update on —

General Carlisle: I talked to their CDF [Chief of Defense Force], Chee Meng. I was just in Singapore. Singapore’s decided to buy the B model, the VSTOL variant to begin with. But I don’t know where they’re at in putting it into their budget. I know that’s a decision that’s been made and that’s why they’re part of the program, but I don’t know where they’re at in putting that in the budget....
The above is a quote from General Carlisle that Singapore is seriously looking at acquiring the F-35B, but he does not know, when this will happen. To manage expectations, on 20 August 2013, the Singapore Minister of Defence, Dr Ng Eng Hen said:
"It is a long-term replacement for our F-16s and to modernise our fleet so there is no acute need for the F-35s. There are no pressures for the SAF (to decide) soon, we will take our time."
In other developments, the Prime Minister of Singapore, Mr Lee Hsien Loong has unveiled a master plan to double capacity at Southeast Asia's busiest airport, build a new waterfront city, move its massive port and a long term plan, where Paya Lebar Air Base (PLAB) will be closed and its fixed wing aircraft relocated to free up land for development (see here for details). Currently, the Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF) has four air bases, three of which (including PLAB) are used for fixed wing operations. As David Boey noted in his blog:
"...From an operational perspective, the closure of PLAB would leave the RSAF with two air bases for fixed wing aircraft on mainland Singapore. There is one emergency runway on Pulau Sudong which could be turned into a fully operational air base, though field security and resupply across open water may pose challenges during operations.

The point that all RSAF fighters and strike aircraft will be shepherded to two vulnerable bases will, undoubtedly, provide ample talking points for discussions on the wisdom of such a proposal.

Casting our minds forward to 2030, one should bear in mind that the F-5 fighters now resident at PLAB will have long been retired by then. The C-130B/H Hercules transports are also expected to have been partially replaced by then, despite the mid-life upgrade performed by ST Aerospace.

The number of F-15SG Strike Eagles could be expanded by the end of this decade, perhaps with an improved variant of the F-15 family...

...By 2030, the RSAF is expected to have deepened and widened its expertise with active protection measures such as anti-missile defences, one of which is expected to step up to take the place of the RSAF's long-serving 35mm Oerlikon AA guns soon."
IMHO, the plan to close PLAB in the 2030 time frame will strengthen the case for RSAF's planned acquisition of the STOVL F-35B. However, given what the Minister of Defence has just said, there will be NO announcement of any F-35B acquisition this year.

Edit: David also has a longer discussion on the issues relating to the Prime Minister's proposal to move from PLAB to Changi East after 2030, given its proximity to an international shipping lane and is more vulnerable to seaborne attack. This means the redevelopment of Changi East airbase will not be complete without measures to improve its ability to generate and sustain air power under fire, not only from the traditional geographic features but from the threats presented by ships as well. While some may take issue with what David says, he has tried to look at the potential risks involved from a risk management perspective of air base hardening. IMHO, the scenario he draws lacks realism and there are also significant gaps in his risk analysis. I am not sure if he is deliberately keeping silent about those gaps, or it is just not well discussed in his latest blog post (beyond just conventional threats at EOR).
________________
“Terrorism is the tactic of demanding the impossible, and demanding it at gunpoint.”
Christopher Hitchens

Last edited by OPSSG; August 23rd, 2013 at 09:38 PM.
OPSSG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 5th, 2013   #55
Junior Member
Private First Class
No Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Hague
Posts: 80
Threads:
The dutch news reported tonight that both partners in the government finally agree with the purchase of the F-35. The PvdA (Labor party) was against it for the longest time, but now they've run out of arguments against it, or so the NOS (Dutch state television) reports. Here's the report (in Dutch): Geen obstakels meer voor JSF - NOS Nieuws

I won't translate but in short it states the governments wish to purchase 35 aircraft with 4.5Bln euro's (around 5.9 Bln USD). That's about 128.57 Mln euro's (about 169.71 Mln USD) per plane, do note that this is the purchase of the aircraft and through lifetime costs. They state a unit cost of 65 Mln per plane (85 Mln USD) which is in line with the promises Gen. Bogdan made some months ago.

The whole Dutch F-35 procurement process has been a crapshoot, and is comparable with procurement in other country's. In my opinion this is a big fat disappointment, to me, to the people of the Netherlands but most of all to the Dutch air force. 35 machines is not enough to maintain a credible capability, the politicians will probably tell us that the F-35 is much more capable and everything will be fine. This ofcoarse is ridiculous because we'll go from a 4 sqn force to a 2sqn force which isn't enough to maintain our current capability's. We'll lose any capability to deploy and maintain a task force of any size, with or without the support of the US or any other ally. We simply won't have the machines to cover anything other than air defense and training... so then why even bother to buy the stupid things!?!?!?!

Am I totally wrong or is buying 35 aircraft just madness?
Toptob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 7th, 2013   #56
Just a bloke
Colonel
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,527
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toptob View Post
The dutch news reported tonight that both partners in the government finally agree with the purchase of the F-35. The PvdA (Labor party) was against it for the longest time, but now they've run out of arguments against it, or so the NOS (Dutch state television) reports. Here's the report (in Dutch): Geen obstakels meer voor JSF - NOS Nieuws

I won't translate but in short it states the governments wish to purchase 35 aircraft with 4.5Bln euro's (around 5.9 Bln USD). That's about 128.57 Mln euro's (about 169.71 Mln USD) per plane, do note that this is the purchase of the aircraft and through lifetime costs. They state a unit cost of 65 Mln per plane (85 Mln USD) which is in line with the promises Gen. Bogdan made some months ago.

The whole Dutch F-35 procurement process has been a crapshoot, and is comparable with procurement in other country's. In my opinion this is a big fat disappointment, to me, to the people of the Netherlands but most of all to the Dutch air force. 35 machines is not enough to maintain a credible capability, the politicians will probably tell us that the F-35 is much more capable and everything will be fine. This ofcoarse is ridiculous because we'll go from a 4 sqn force to a 2sqn force which isn't enough to maintain our current capability's. We'll lose any capability to deploy and maintain a task force of any size, with or without the support of the US or any other ally. We simply won't have the machines to cover anything other than air defense and training... so then why even bother to buy the stupid things!?!?!?!

Am I totally wrong or is buying 35 aircraft just madness?
Glad to hear the Dutch appear to have settled on the F-35 but why is the number of aircraft so important?

35-36 aircraft will allow the RNLAF to sustain a deployment of 6-12 aircraft for varying periods of time. Fewer aircraft can deploy for longer, larger numbers for shorter periods of time.

12 F-35A's deployed in support of NATO operations will be nothing to sneeze at and 6 aircraft were deployed for the majority of the time the RNLAF spent on operations in Afghanistan.

I suspect the number of aircraft was carefully aimed at providing minimal numbers of aircraft for local air defence and contribution to NATO Air Policing missions as well as retaining a deployable fighter package capability.

I get the strong suspicion with the Dutch at present, that even if a significantly cheaper aircraft were to be acquired, you may well have seen that no more of that type would have been acquired anyway.

Saving cash is the primary determinate of capability in this instance, at least you're getting the most capable option available...
ADMk2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 9th, 2013   #57
Moderator
Major General
RobWilliams's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,311
Threads:
3rd UK squadron to fly the F35 has been named

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/r...o-fly-new-jets

So, the UK's F-35 fleet currently will consist of

17(R) Squadron RAF - OEU
  • Stand up 2015 IIRC at Edwards AFB
617 Squadron RAF - combat squadron
  • Stand up 2016, presumably from the delivery of 4 F35B's from LRIP-8
809 Naval Air Squadron - combat squadron
  • Stand up 2018

Presumably the remaining 'unallocated' aircraft of the 48 will be part of an OCU squadron to be formed in the future, AFAIK there is a plan for a UK based OCU and some people believe it's a signal that the UK wants to make a big investment in the F-35 as we could just piggy-back on what the US does for pilot training.
RobWilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10th, 2013   #58
Defense Enthusiast
Captain
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 784
Threads:
I wonder if down the road the RSAF may consider ordering more F-35s in lieu of enhanced Eagles and follow a similar path that the RAAF is taking toward standardizing on the Lightning-II? Perhaps a mix of A and B variants wold provide a potent capability with assured technology refreshes and advanced shared sustainment infrastructure should give JSF the advantage.
colay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2013   #59
Defense Enthusiast
Master Sergeant
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 325
Threads:
Dutch to purchase 37 F-35 fighter planes - sources | Reuters

The Netherlands will get only 37 F-35 (including trainers).

How many will they use for training?

The numbers are disapointingly low, and it seems other parts of the Dutch defense forces are being hit even harder -- OPSSG perhaps you need to revisit some of "101" texts. It seems the Netherlands Air Force will be very limited in the future (but still very capable I am sure).

The good news is of course that they did go for the F-35 and not a cheaper alternative.
Vivendi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2013   #60
Moderator
Major General
RobWilliams's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,311
Threads:
DSEi: UK holding firm on F-35 procurement plan

Two points people have taken a bit too much at face value
  • Currently no official change from the 138 order
  • Currently no intention on changing variants for a future order

There's no official change from 138 because the change is officially going to happen during SDSR 2015, it's widely expected that the numbers will be reduced, but just because they say there's no change from 138 means that 138 will be the end result.

The variants bit is interesting though, about not wanting to bring the variant choice into it again because of how they got stung last time around. But again, any choice on variants will come from 2015 anyway.

Basically, they can say there is no change currently but that's no promise about it being the final result.
RobWilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 AM.