Go Back   DefenceTalk Forum - Military & Defense Forums > Global Defense & Military > Air Force & Aviation

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence


F-35 avionics system

This is a discussion on F-35 avionics system within the Air Force & Aviation forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; So i recently saw this new blog about aircraft equipment https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...wordpress.com/ , the blog seem like a great collection of ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.
Old August 12th, 2016   #1
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 12
Threads:
F-35 avionics system

So i recently saw this new blog about aircraft equipment
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...wordpress.com/ , the blog seem like a great collection of information and the author has managed to make it an enjoyable read without any of the fanboy or nationalistic stuff so i decided to share it here

About radar
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...ountermeasure/
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...ntals-part-ii/

About ECM
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...ermeasure-ecm/

About stealth
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...-and-benefits/

About ESM and geolocation
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...e-geolocation/
moon_light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12th, 2016   #2
Defense Aficionado
Major General
John Fedup's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,178
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon_light View Post
So i recently saw this new blog about aircraft equipment
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...wordpress.com/ , the blog seem like a great collection of information and the author has managed to make it an enjoyable read without any of the fanboy or nationalistic stuff so i decided to share it here

About radar
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...ountermeasure/
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...ntals-part-ii/

About ECM
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...ermeasure-ecm/

About stealth
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...-and-benefits/

About ESM and geolocation
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandav...e-geolocation/
Western airforces must be cursing the day the Internet came into being. Sure seems like a lot of free technical information is available. I guess spies already found this stuff long before it got posted on websites.
John Fedup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12th, 2016   #3
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 12
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Fedup View Post
Western airforces must be cursing the day the Internet came into being. Sure seems like a lot of free technical information is available. I guess spies already found this stuff long before it got posted on websites.
Personally , i dont think spies care about these information , these knowledge may seem complex to us but to them it probably like the basics 1+1=2
moon_light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12th, 2016   #4
Defense Aficionado
Major General
John Fedup's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,178
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon_light View Post
Personally , i dont think spies care about these information , these knowledge may seem complex to us but to them it probably like the basics 1+1=2
IIRC, a scientific paper by a Russian scientist was the basis for conceiving the F-117. Basic scientific knowledge is important and so is the talent to apply it.
John Fedup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2016   #5
Junior Member
Private First Class
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Manila
Posts: 86
Threads:
^that would be the 1962 paper (english translation 1971) by physicist Pyotr Ufimtsev, "Method of Edge Waves in the Physical Theory of Diffraction": www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=AD0733203
r3mu511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2016   #6
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 12
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Fedup View Post
IIRC, a scientific paper by a Russian scientist was the basis for conceiving the F-117. Basic scientific knowledge is important and so is the talent to apply it.
Didnt the German created a stealth aircraft even before that ?. If i remember correctly , it the Ho229 or something
http://www.luft46.com/ggart/ggho9-2.jpg
moon_light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 15th, 2016   #7
Super Moderator
General
swerve's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 6,619
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Fedup View Post
IIRC, a scientific paper by a Russian scientist was the basis for conceiving the F-117. Basic scientific knowledge is important and so is the talent to apply it.
IIRC Gerhard Löbert, the head of the German Lampyridae 1980s stealth project, said after it was made public, & someone questioned whether it was really independent of US work, given that it had adopted faceting like the F-117 that "Maxwell's equations have been public for over 100 years".
swerve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 15th, 2016   #8
Junior Member
Private First Class
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Manila
Posts: 86
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by swerve View Post
IIRC Gerhard Löbert, the head of the German Lampyridae 1980s stealth project, said after it was made public, & someone questioned whether it was really independent of US work, given that it had adopted faceting like the F-117 that "Maxwell's equations have been public for over 100 years".
^maybe the question they should've asked instead was whether it was independent of Ufimtsev's work, hehe
r3mu511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2016   #9
Super Moderator
General
swerve's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 6,619
Threads:
It would be interesting to know if the Lampyridae team knew of Ufimtsev's work.

Ufimtsev showed a way to calculate RCS before building a model. That method wasn't useful until computers could be thrown at it, which is why the USSR wasn't interested in it to start with. It was a step, which built on earlier work by people in other countries (e.g. the UK & Germany), as others later built on it. Low RCS aircraft could be designed & built without his work, but given his papers & significant computing power, it was much easier.

Good stuff, & useful for more than designing low RCS aircraft, but not absolutely essential.
swerve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2016   #10
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,997
Threads:
I've snapshotted the history of all the major players and timelines in the stealth primer elsewhere.....
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
http://cofda.wordpress.com/

gf a.k.a. ROBOPIMP T5C
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2016   #11
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,997
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Fedup View Post
Western airforces must be cursing the day the Internet came into being. Sure seems like a lot of free technical information is available. I guess spies already found this stuff long before it got posted on websites.
the east germans were regarded as probably the greatest tech harvesters of all time - and yet a fat lot of good it did them as they reached the tipping point where the knowledge they were securing was beyond their capacity to utilise even when handed on to the soviets

after the downfall of the wall it was apparent that they struggled and never were in a position to maximise what they had gathered.
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
http://cofda.wordpress.com/

gf a.k.a. ROBOPIMP T5C
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2016   #12
Junior Member
Private First Class
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Manila
Posts: 86
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by swerve View Post
Ufimtsev showed a way to calculate RCS before building a model.
Fwiw, the technical content of Ufimtsev's paper (link to paper was in my first post above) is actually at a much lower level, as it was focused on a method of computation for the electric and magnetic fields produced by wave diffraction on simple geometric shapes (triangular wedge, disk, cylinder, cone, and other rotated paraboloids).

What he provided was a numerically computable approximation for the diffracted EM field strengths for these simple shapes which, though not as rigorous as those produced by the mathematical theory of diffraction, did not have as large a variation/error in values (when compared to experimental results) as those produced from the diffraction theory based on geometrical optics (he presents both in his paper as well).

Ufimtsev achieved the better results compared to geometrical optics because his work included focus on the currents induced on the surface of those simple shapes near the discontinuities/edges of the surface (what he termed as "non-uniform induced currents", as opposed to the "uniform induced currents", ie. current away from the edges, which was the focus of the geometrical optic approach).

As for the Germans, Ufimtsev does prominently cite Karl Schwarzschild several times in his paper as one of the early innovators in using the same computational method (what he terms the "physical theory of diffraction") in the computation of the wave diffraction of a slit. So this should make the German Lampyridae team happy as Ufimtsev credits a German physicist as an innovator of this computational approach, lol.

---

After that, it was then up to Denys Overholser (the mathematician at Lockheed) to actually take Ufimtsev's computation approximation method for triangular wedges and marry that with decompositioning a body into an aggregate of such simple shapes, computing the field strengths for each shape, and via the principle of superposition summing up the individual fields to give a resultant EM diffracted field value which when compared to the incident EM field strength would allow him to compute the RCS of the body he was studying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by swerve View Post
Low RCS aircraft could be designed & built without his work
In Rebecca Grant's book "B-2 Spirit of Innovation", that's exactly what she described about how Northrop went about in designing their XST aircraft (ie. the competition that led up to the F-117).

Since they didn't use Ufimtsev's paper and didn't have an equivalent to Overholser's "Echo-1" software being used at Lockheed, they instead relied on their historical experience in experimental testing/evaluation of RCS of actual USAF aircraft, with their XST design work progressing by bulding models and using actual range testing to validate their design.
r3mu511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2016   #13
Super Moderator
General
swerve's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 6,619
Threads:
OK, so Ufimtsev provided a base on which a good method of predicting RCS could be built.

I've read that Northrop had its own software for predicting RCS, which predated the translation of Ufimtsev's main paper & was therefore written without reference to it, & gave a much looser approximation, therefore needing much more application of the old methods of models & range testing.
swerve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2016   #14
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,997
Threads:
look at the first 4 american manned versions of stealth aircraft - all take unique approaches to the platform design - all use different approaches and design philosophies

ditto for every unmanned development

A brief history of LO
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
http://cofda.wordpress.com/

gf a.k.a. ROBOPIMP T5C
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2016   #15
Junior Member
Private First Class
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Manila
Posts: 86
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by swerve View Post
I've read that Northrop had its own software for predicting RCS, which predated the translation of Ufimtsev's main paper
Do you happen to have any more info on this? Maybe the name of the person who worked on this software for Northrop? I'ld really like to read up on more papers which were used in the past by other manufacturers similar to the 1970's relationship of Lockheed to Overholser/Ufimstev's work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gf0012-aust View Post
Yup thanks, I read that article of yours right after I joined the forum. I'll admit though my tech interest is less on LO as a whole, and more on just RF scattering.
r3mu511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 PM.